Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quotas for Ephemeral Storage #1029

Open
22 tasks done
RobertKrawitz opened this issue Apr 30, 2019 · 108 comments
Open
22 tasks done

Quotas for Ephemeral Storage #1029

RobertKrawitz opened this issue Apr 30, 2019 · 108 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team
Milestone

Comments

@RobertKrawitz
Copy link
Contributor

RobertKrawitz commented Apr 30, 2019

Enhancement Description

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Apr 30, 2019
@RobertKrawitz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/sig node

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Apr 30, 2019
@derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member

per sig-node discussion, this is good.

the kep will merge here: #646

/milestone v1.15

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.15 milestone Apr 30, 2019
@kacole2
Copy link

kacole2 commented May 1, 2019

@RobertKrawitz This is OK to track for 1.15. However, please update the KEP with established graduation criteria for Beta and Alpha when possible.

/stage alpha

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status label May 1, 2019
@kacole2 kacole2 added the tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team label May 1, 2019
@makoscafee
Copy link

Hey, @RobertKrawitz @derekwaynecarr 👋 I'm the v1.15 docs Lead.
Does this enhancement require any new docs (or modifications)?

Just a friendly reminder we're looking for a PR against k/website (branch dev-1.15) due by Thursday, May 30th. It would be great if it's the start of the full documentation, but even a placeholder PR is acceptable. Let me know if you have any questions!

@RobertKrawitz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, this will require new documentation.

I will open the website PR today.

@kacole2
Copy link

kacole2 commented May 28, 2019

Hi @RobertKrawitz @derekwaynecarr . Code Freeze is Thursday, May 30th 2019 @ EOD PST. All enhancements going into the release must be code-complete, including tests, and have docs PRs open.

Please list all current k/k PRs so they can be tracked going into freeze. If the PRs aren't merged by freeze, this feature will slip for the 1.15 release cycle. Only release-blocking issues and PRs will be allowed in the milestone.

If you know this will slip, please reply back and let us know. Thanks!

@makoscafee
Copy link

Hey, @RobertKrawitz @derekwaynecarr .Just a friendly reminder we're looking for at least a draft/placeholder PR against k/website (branch dev-1.15) due by Thursday, May 30th 2019 @ EOD PST.

@RobertKrawitz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@makoscafee The k/website PR is kubernetes/website#14268

@kacole2
Copy link

kacole2 commented May 30, 2019

Hi @RobertKrawitz @derekwaynecarr , today is code freeze. I do not see a reply for any k/k PRs to track for this merge. It's now being marked as At Risk in the 1.15 Enhancement Tracking Sheet. If there is no response, or you respond with PRs to track and they are not merged by EOD PST, this will be dropped from the 1.15 Milestone. After this point, only release-blocking issues and PRs will be allowed in the milestone with an exception.

@RobertKrawitz
Copy link
Contributor Author

The PR for this is kubernetes/kubernetes#66928

@RobertKrawitz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@kacole2
Copy link

kacole2 commented Jul 8, 2019

Hi @RobertKrawitz , I'm the 1.16 Enhancement Lead. Is this feature going to be graduating alpha/beta/stable stages in 1.16? Please let me know so it can be added to the 1.6 Tracking Spreadsheet. If not's graduating, I will remove it from the milestone and change the tracked label.

Once coding begins or if it already has, please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly.

Milestone dates are Enhancement Freeze 7/30 and Code Freeze 8/29.

Thank you.

@kacole2 kacole2 modified the milestones: v1.15, v1.16 Jul 15, 2019
@kacole2 kacole2 added tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Jul 15, 2019
@kacole2 kacole2 removed this from the v1.16 milestone Jul 15, 2019
@kcmartin
Copy link

kcmartin commented Oct 2, 2019

Hello @RobertKrawitz -- 1.17 Enhancement Shadow here! 🙂

I wanted to reach out to see if this enhancement will be graduating to alpha/beta/stable in 1.17?


Please let me know so that this enhancement can be added to 1.17 tracking sheet.

Thank you!

🔔Friendly Reminder

The current release schedule is

  • Monday, September 23 - Release Cycle Begins
  • Tuesday, October 15, EOD PST - Enhancements Freeze
  • Thursday, November 14, EOD PST - Code Freeze
  • Tuesday, November 19 - Docs must be completed and reviewed
  • Monday, December 9 - Kubernetes 1.17.0 Released

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 31, 2019
@palnabarun
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@Princesso
Copy link

Hi @RobertKrawitz @pacoxu @PannagaRao ,
1.31 Doc lead here. I noticed that this Enhancement work already has a draft PR here, however, the PR is closed. Can you re-open the PR against dev-1.31 branch in the k/website repo. This deadline for having a draft PR up is Thursday June 27, 2024 18:00 PDT.

@sreeram-venkitesh sreeram-venkitesh added the tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team label Jun 24, 2024
@Princesso
Copy link

Hi @RobertKrawitz @pacoxu @PannagaRao, this is a gentle reminder that today is the deadline for having the doc draft PR opened against dev-1.31.

@haircommander
Copy link
Contributor

here's the PR kubernetes/website#46967

@a-mccarthy
Copy link

hi @haircommander, friendly reminder about the upcoming blog opt-in and placeholder deadline on July 3rd. Please open a blog placeholder PR if you are interested in contributing a blog.

@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

dipesh-rawat commented Jul 2, 2024

Hey again @RobertKrawitz @pacoxu @PannagaRao 👋, 1.31 Enhancements team here,

Just checking in as we approach code freeze at at 02:00 UTC Wednesday 24th July 2024 / 19:00 PDT Tuesday 23rd July 2024.

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • All PRs to the Kubernetes repo that are related to your enhancement are linked in the above issue description (for tracking purposes).
  • All PR/s are ready to be merged (they have approved and lgtm labels applied) by the code freeze deadline. This includes tests.

For this enhancement, it looks like the following PRs are open and need to be merged before code freeze (and we need to update the Issue description to include all the related PRs of this KEP):

Additionally, please let me know if there are any other PRs in k/k not listed in the descrption that we should track for this KEP, so that we can maintain accurate status.

For this KEP, we would need to do the following:

  • Ensure all PRs are prepared for merging (they have approved and lgtm labels applied) by the code freeze deadline. This includes tests.

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance.

The status of this enhancement is marked as at risk for code freeze.

Edited: To include the PR related to the KEP

@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat moved this from Tracked for Enhancements Freeze to At Risk for Code Freeze in 1.31 Enhancements Tracking Jul 2, 2024
@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

Hey again @RobertKrawitz @pacoxu @PannagaRao 👋, 1.31 Enhancements team here,

Just a quick friendly reminder as we approach code freeze in around two weeks time, at 02:00 UTC Wednesday 24th July 2024 / 19:00 PDT Tuesday 23rd July 2024.

The current status of this enhancement is marked as at risk for code freeze. There are a few requirements mentioned in the comment #1029 (comment) that still need to be completed.

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance.

@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

Hey again @RobertKrawitz @pacoxu @PannagaRao 👋, 1.31 Enhancements team here,

Just a quick friendly reminder as we approach code freeze next week, at 02:00 UTC Wednesday 24th July 2024 / 19:00 PDT Tuesday 23rd July 2024.

The current status of this enhancement is marked as at risk for code freeze. There are a few requirements mentioned in the comment #1029 (comment) that still need to be completed.

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance.

@hacktivist123 hacktivist123 moved this from At Risk for Code Freeze to Tracked for Code Freeze in 1.31 Enhancements Tracking Jul 18, 2024
@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat moved this from Tracked for Code Freeze to At Risk for Code Freeze in 1.31 Enhancements Tracking Jul 18, 2024
@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

Hey again @RobertKrawitz @pacoxu @PannagaRao 👋, 1.31 Enhancements team here,

Just a quick friendly reminder as we approach code freeze in less than 2 days, at 02:00 UTC Wednesday 24th July 2024 / 19:00 PDT Tuesday 23rd July 2024.

The current status of this enhancement is marked as at risk for code freeze. There are a few requirements mentioned in the comment #1029 (comment) that still need to be completed.

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance.

@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

Hey again @RobertKrawitz @pacoxu @PannagaRao 👋, 1.31 Enhancements team here,

Just checking in as we approach code freeze at 02:00 UTC Wednesday 24th July 2024 / 19:00 PDT Tuesday 23rd July 2024.

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • All PRs to the Kubernetes repo that are related to your enhancement are linked in the above issue description (for tracking purposes).
  • All PR/s are ready to be merged (they have approved and lgtm labels applied) by the code freeze deadline. This includes tests.

With all the implementation(code related) PRs merged as per the issue description:

Additionally, please let me know if there are any other PRs in k/k not listed in the description that we should track for this KEP, so that we can maintain accurate status.

This enhancement is now marked as tracked for code freeze for the 1.31 Code Freeze!

@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat moved this from At Risk for Code Freeze to Tracked for Code Freeze in 1.31 Enhancements Tracking Jul 23, 2024
@Princesso Princesso moved this from Tracked for Code Freeze to At Risk for Doc Freeze in 1.31 Enhancements Tracking Jul 29, 2024
@Princesso Princesso moved this from At Risk for Doc Freeze to Tracked for Doc Freeze in 1.31 Enhancements Tracking Jul 30, 2024
@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, what are the plans for 1.32?

@haircommander
Copy link
Contributor

this only just went to beta so I presume nothing until 1.33

@tjons
Copy link
Contributor

tjons commented Sep 16, 2024

Inadvertently added this to the 1.32 tracking board

/remove-label lead-opted-in

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release label Sep 16, 2024
@pacoxu
Copy link
Member

pacoxu commented Sep 23, 2024

this only just went to beta so I presume nothing until 1.33

As this depends on the User Namespace feature and is beta but by default false/disabled, I assume that the next step is beta 2, default true which needs to be done after UserNamespacesSupport is beta and by default true.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team
Projects
Status: Removed from Milestone
Status: Not for release
Status: Tracked for Doc Freeze
Development

No branches or pull requests