Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable running conformance tests without beta REST APIs or features #1333

Closed
liggitt opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 39 comments
Closed

Enable running conformance tests without beta REST APIs or features #1333

liggitt opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 39 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/architecture Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Architecture. stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team

Comments

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Oct 23, 2019

Enable running conformance tests without beta REST APIs or features

@liggitt liggitt self-assigned this Oct 23, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Oct 23, 2019
@mrbobbytables mrbobbytables added the sig/architecture Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Architecture. label Oct 27, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Oct 27, 2019
@mrbobbytables mrbobbytables added the tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team label Oct 29, 2019
@palnabarun
Copy link
Member

palnabarun commented Jan 13, 2020

Hey there @liggitt -- 1.18 Enhancements shadow here. I wanted to check in and see if you think this Enhancement will be graduating to alpha in 1.18 or having a major change in its current level?

The current release schedule is:

  • Monday, January 6th - Release Cycle Begins
  • Tuesday, January 28th EOD PST - Enhancements Freeze
  • Thursday, March 5th, EOD PST - Code Freeze
  • Monday, March 16th - Docs must be completed and reviewed
  • Tuesday, March 24th - Kubernetes 1.18.0 Released

To be included in the release,

  1. The KEP PR must be merged
  2. The KEP must be in an implementable state
  3. The KEP must have test plans and graduation criteria.

If you would like to include this enhancement, once coding begins please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly. 👍

We'll be tracking enhancements here: http://bit.ly/k8s-1-18-enhancements

Thanks! :)

@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Jan 15, 2020

This is targeting phase 1 (defined in the KEP) in v1.18

@palnabarun
Copy link
Member

palnabarun commented Jan 15, 2020

Thank you @liggitt for the updates. :)

@jeremyrickard jeremyrickard added tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Jan 29, 2020
@jeremyrickard
Copy link
Contributor

jeremyrickard commented Jan 29, 2020

/milestone v1.18

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.18 milestone Jan 29, 2020
@palnabarun
Copy link
Member

palnabarun commented Feb 5, 2020

Hi @liggitt, just a friendly reminder that the Code Freeze will go into effect on Thursday 5th March.

Can you please link all the k/k PRs or any other PRs which should be tracked for this enhancement?

Thank You :)

@VineethReddy02
Copy link

VineethReddy02 commented Feb 5, 2020

Hello, @liggitt I'm 1.18 docs lead.
Does this enhancement work planned for 1.18 require any new docs (or modifications to existing docs)? If not, can you please update the 1.18 Enhancement Tracker Sheet (or let me know and I'll do so)
If so, just a friendly reminder we're looking for a PR against k/website (branch dev-1.18) due by Friday, Feb 28th, it can just be a placeholder PR at this time. Let me know if you have any questions!

@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Feb 7, 2020

probably no docs for the work done on this in 1.18 (this is focused on a CI/test aspect of our dev process)

@jeremyrickard
Copy link
Contributor

jeremyrickard commented Feb 24, 2020

Hi @liggitt, just a friendly reminder that the Code Freeze will go into effect on Thursday 5th March.

Can you please link all the k/k PRs or any other PRs which should be tracked for this enhancement?

Thank You :)

@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Feb 29, 2020

This is not delivering code in k/k this release, this "enhancement" consists of additional test jobs/configurations that are not release-blocking

@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Mar 1, 2020

@palnabarun palnabarun added tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Apr 17, 2020
@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Apr 20, 2020

/milestone v1.19

Once CSR graduates to v1, this will update to complete phase 2

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot modified the milestones: v1.18, v1.19 Apr 20, 2020
@harshanarayana
Copy link

harshanarayana commented Apr 29, 2020

Hey there @liggitt, 1.19 Enhancements shadow here. I wanted to check in and see if you think this Enhancement will be graduating in 1.19?

In order to have this part of the release:

  1. The KEP PR must be merged in an implementable state
  2. The KEP must have test plans
  3. The KEP must have graduation criteria.

The current release schedule is:

  • Monday, April 13: Week 1 - Release cycle begins
  • Tuesday, May 19: Week 6 - Enhancements Freeze
  • Thursday, June 25: Week 11 - Code Freeze
  • Thursday, July 9: Week 14 - Docs must be completed and reviewed
  • Tuesday, August 4: Week 17 - Kubernetes v1.19.0 released

If you do, I'll add it to the 1.19 tracking sheet (http://bit.ly/k8s-1-19-enhancements). Once coding begins please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly. 👍

Thanks!

@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Apr 29, 2020

Once CSR graduates to v1, this will update to complete phase 2 (planned for 1.19)

@harshanarayana
Copy link

harshanarayana commented Apr 30, 2020

Hi @liggitt thanks for following up with an update on the status. I will update the tracking sheets accordingly.

@palnabarun
Copy link
Member

palnabarun commented May 4, 2020

/stage beta

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status label May 4, 2020
@palnabarun palnabarun added tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team labels May 4, 2020
@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Sep 1, 2020

The KEP had additional phases added to it related to identifying optional GA APIs. That phase has not been implemented.

@kikisdeliveryservice kikisdeliveryservice removed the tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team label Sep 11, 2020
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

kikisdeliveryservice commented Sep 11, 2020

/milestone clear

(removing this enhancement issue from the v1.19 milestone as the milestone is complete)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed this from the v1.19 milestone Sep 11, 2020
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

kikisdeliveryservice commented Sep 13, 2020

Hi @liggitt

Enhancements Lead here. Any plans for this in 1.20?

Thanks!
Kirsten

@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Sep 15, 2020

Not for 1.20... linked to the conformance profiles issue the third phase intersects with

@kikisdeliveryservice kikisdeliveryservice added the tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team label Sep 15, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

fejta-bot commented Dec 14, 2020

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 14, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

fejta-bot commented Jan 13, 2021

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 13, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

fejta-bot commented Feb 12, 2021

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Feb 12, 2021

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ehashman
Copy link
Member

ehashman commented May 5, 2021

/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented May 5, 2021

@ehashman: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this May 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label May 5, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

k8s-triage-robot commented Aug 3, 2021

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 3, 2021
@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Aug 4, 2021

The portions of this enhancement dealing with non-GA APIs are complete.

The remaining part (phase 3) intersects with the conformance profiles issue, which was closed as stale (#1618).

/unassign
As I am not currently working on the optional-GA API portion. @johnbelamaric, is there a more current version of #1618 that is active that this should be linked to?

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

k8s-triage-robot commented Sep 3, 2021

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Sep 3, 2021
@johnbelamaric
Copy link
Contributor

johnbelamaric commented Sep 8, 2021

As I am not currently working on the optional-GA API portion. @johnbelamaric, is there a more current version of #1618 that is active that this should be linked to?

No. I am not currently pursuing this as there doesn't seem to be real demand for it in the community.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

k8s-triage-robot commented Oct 8, 2021

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Oct 8, 2021

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/architecture Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Architecture. stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests