-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Container Resource based Pod Autoscaling #1610
Comments
/sig autoscaling |
Hey there @arjunrn -- 1.19 Enhancements shadow here. I wanted to check in and see if you think this Enhancement will be graduating in 1.19? In order to have this part of the release:
The current release schedule is:
If you do, I'll add it to the 1.19 tracking sheet (http://bit.ly/k8s-1-19-enhancements). Once coding begins please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly. 👍 Thanks! |
Hey @arjunrn, I'm following up on my previous update on this Enhancement being part of the Do you happen to have any update on the possiblity of this being included in the release Thanks again for your time and contributions. 🖖 |
1 similar comment
Hey @arjunrn, I'm following up on my previous update on this Enhancement being part of the Do you happen to have any update on the possiblity of this being included in the release Thanks again for your time and contributions. 🖖 |
Hey @arjunrn, any plans for the Enhancements to be included in Enhancements freeze is on May 19 Note that recently the KEP format has changed. Additionally, #1620 merged recently, adding production readiness review questions to the KEP template. Thanks, |
Hey @arjunrn, Unfortunately the deadline for the 1.19 Enhancement freeze has passed and the KEP is still in |
Marking to a deferred milestone after discussing with @arjunrn /milestone v1.20 |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Hi @arjunrn Enhancements Lead here. Are you still planning on bringing this to alpha in 1.20? Thanks |
@kikisdeliveryservice Yes, I'm still working on it and hope to have the feature merged in time for 1.20 |
Great thanks for the update! |
Hi @arjunrn, 1.20 Enhancement shadow here 👋. Since your Enhancement is scheduled to be in 1.20, please keep in mind the important upcoming dates: As a reminder, please link all of your k/k PR as well as docs PR to this issue so we can track them. Thank you! |
@kinarashah Updated the description with the implementation and docs PR links. |
That's awesome, thank you for getting them up so quickly! |
Hello @arjunrn 👋, 1.20 Docs shadow here. Does this enhancement work planned for 1.20 require any new docs or modification to existing docs? This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Nov 6th Also take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release. Thank you! |
Hey @arjunrn Just to confirm : This is now finished for 1.20 correct? Just a reminder that Code Freeze is coming up tomorrow Thursday, November 12th. All PRs must be merged by that date, otherwise an Exception is required. Thanks, |
@kikisdeliveryservice yes both the implementation and the docs have been merged. |
@gjtempleton Can you add |
/milestone v1.30 |
@gjtempleton: You must be a member of the kubernetes/milestone-maintainers GitHub team to set the milestone. If you believe you should be able to issue the /milestone command, please contact your Milestone Maintainers Team and have them propose you as an additional delegate for this responsibility. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hello @sanposhiho 👋, Enhancements team here. Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 02:00 UTC Friday 9th February 2024. This enhancement is targeting for stage Here's where this enhancement currently stands:
For this KEP, we would just need to update the following:
The status of this enhancement is marked as |
@mwielgus Can you give it |
/milestone v1.30 |
Where is the KEP update PR? |
|
With all the requirements fulfilled this enhancement is now marked as tracked for the upcoming enhancements freeze 🚀 |
Hi @sanposhiho, 👋 from the v1.30 Communications Team! We'd love for you to opt in to write a feature blog about your enhancement! We encourage blogs for features including, but not limited to: breaking changes, features and changes important to our users, and features that have been in progress for a long time and are graduating. To opt in, you need to open a Feature Blog placeholder PR against the website repository. |
Hello @sanposhiho 👋, 1.30 Docs Lead here. Does this enhancement work planned for 1.30 require any new docs or modification to existing docs? Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release. |
@a-mccarthy We don't need a blog post for this feature since we've got the one in the past release. Thanks. @drewhagen Sure, here it is kubernetes/website#45204 |
Hey again @sanposhiho 👋 Enhancements team here, Just checking in as we approach code freeze at 02:00 UTC Wednesday 6th March 2024 . Here's where this enhancement currently stands:
For this enhancement, I couldn't find any (open) PRs in k/k. With this, it is now marked as Please let me know if there are other PRs in k/k we should be tracking for this KEP. |
I've updated the issue description with links to the related PRs, we're currently only waiting on kubernetes/kubernetes#123482 being approved. |
1 similar comment
I've updated the issue description with links to the related PRs, we're currently only waiting on kubernetes/kubernetes#123482 being approved. |
Hello @sanposhiho 👋 , Enhancements team here. With all the implementation(code related) PRs merged as per the issue description: This enhancement is now marked as |
@praparn I meant it's better to file as an issue in kubernetes/kubernetes. |
Note with thanks. Will open new issue and delete this. |
Actually, I believe we can close this issue since we reach stable. Feel free to reopen if anything additionally to be done. 🎉 /close |
@sanposhiho: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
OCPBUGS-28637: Update cluster-wide proxy Risks and Mitigations for Windows nodes.
Enhancement Description
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: