Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

k8s.io Group Protection #2337

Closed
4 tasks
shekhar-rajak opened this issue Jan 26, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed
4 tasks

k8s.io Group Protection #2337

shekhar-rajak opened this issue Jan 26, 2021 · 6 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery.

Comments

@shekhar-rajak
Copy link
Member

shekhar-rajak commented Jan 26, 2021

Enhancement Description

  • One-line enhancement description (can be used as a release note): k8s.io Group Protection
  • Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal:

API groups are organized by namespace, similar to java packages. authorization.k8s.io is one example. When users create
CRDs, they get to specify an API group and their type will be injected into that group by the kube-apiserver.

The *.k8s.io or *.kubernetes.io groups are owned by the Kubernetes community and protected by API review (see What APIs need to be reviewed,
to ensure consistency and quality. To avoid confusion in our API groups and prevent accidentally claiming a
space inside of the kubernetes API groups, the kube-apiserver needs to be updated to protect these reserved API groups.

This KEP proposes adding an api-approved.kubernetes.io annotation to CustomResourceDefinition. This is only needed if
the CRD group is k8s.io, kubernetes.io, or ends with .k8s.io, .kubernetes.io. The value should be a link to a
to a URL where the current spec was approved, so updates to the spec should also update the URL.

metadata:
  annotations:
    "api-approved.kubernetes.io": "https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/78458"
  • Discussion Link:
  • Primary contact (assignee): @deads2k
  • Responsible SIGs: sig-api-machinery
  • Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):
    • Alpha release target (x.y):
    • Beta release target (x.y):
    • Stable release target (x.y):
  • Alpha
    • KEP (k/enhancements) update PR(s):
    • Code (k/k) update PR(s):
    • Docs (k/website) update PR(s):

Please keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team to track the evolution of the enhancement efficiently.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Jan 26, 2021
@shekhar-rajak
Copy link
Member Author

shekhar-rajak commented Jan 26, 2021

#2331 created for migrating the old keps into new template.

@LappleApple
Copy link
Contributor

LappleApple commented Apr 8, 2021

/sig api-machinery

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Apr 8, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

fejta-bot commented Jul 7, 2021

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 7, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

k8s-triage-robot commented Aug 6, 2021

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Aug 6, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

k8s-triage-robot commented Sep 5, 2021

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Sep 5, 2021

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants