-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KEP: Add a +featureGate tag to API #2558
Comments
This will be really useful for SIG Docs. |
Created #2560 /assign |
/sig architecture |
/remove-sig architecture |
/stage alpha |
With #2560 merged this enhancement is complete for 1.22 enhancements freeze. /sig architecture |
@JamesLaverack it's all good. thanks for the heads up. |
Hello @thockin 👋, 1.22 Docs release lead here. Please follow the steps detailed in the documentation to open a PR against dev-1.22 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Fri July 9, 11:59 PM PDT.
Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to familiarize yourself with the docs requirement for the release. |
Hey @apelisse, can you confirm if @nikhita's PR kubernetes/kubernetes#103022 is the correct (and only) k/k PR for this change in 1.22? (As a note we've got @apelisse down as the point of contact for this enhancement in the tracking spreadsheet, is that still correct?) |
Yes, kubernetes/kubernetes#103022 will be the only k/k PR. We might split it into two PRs for easier review though. To elaborate, the main changes are in kube-openapi (kubernetes/kube-openapi#238) and the k/k PR imports the (updated) kube-openapi repo. |
@JamesLaverack update -- we would be moving this KEP to the next release. kubernetes/kube-openapi#238 has lgtm but there are some last-minute discussions in #2752 and we will not be able to reach consensus before code freeze. |
Okay @nikhita, thank you for letting us know. /milestone clear |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close not-planned |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned". In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
@nikhita Is this still alive? I see kubernetes/kubernetes#103022 was closed for inactivity. I just want some common form across API comments - did we get too ambitious? |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
#4937 marks this as withdrawn. We have a de-facto norm of +featureGate now, which was the original goal |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close not-planned |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned". In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Enhancement Description
k/enhancements
) update PR(s): Add KEP for publishing versioning info in OpenAPI #2560k/k
) update PR(s):k/website
) update PR(s):The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: