Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Out-of-Tree IBM Cloud Provider #671

Closed
andrewsykim opened this issue Jan 2, 2019 · 56 comments
Closed

Support Out-of-Tree IBM Cloud Provider #671

andrewsykim opened this issue Jan 2, 2019 · 56 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status tracked/out-of-tree Denotes an out-of-tree enhancement issue, which does not need to be tracked by the Release Team

Comments

@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member

andrewsykim commented Jan 2, 2019

Enhancement Description

  • One-line enhancement description (can be used as a release note):
    Support Out-of-Tree IBM Cloud Provider by running the cloud-controller-manager
  • Primary contact (assignee):
    @rtheis @spzala
  • Responsible SIGs:
    SIG IBM, SIG Cloud Provider
  • Reviewer(s) - (for LGTM) recommend having 2+ reviewers (at least one from code-area OWNERS file) agreed to review. Reviewers from multiple companies preferred:
    @rtheis @spzala @andrewsykim
  • Approver (likely from SIG/area to which enhancement belongs):
    @rtheis @spzala @andrewsykim
  • Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):
    • Alpha release target (x.y)
    • Beta release target (x.y)
    • Stable release target (x.y)

Ref #88

/sig ibm-cloud cloud-provider

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. label Jan 2, 2019
@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Jan 22, 2019

We have started investigating this enhancement and are working on the initial design.

@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Jan 23, 2019

/sig ibm-cloud

@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Jan 23, 2019

/sig ibmcloud

@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Jan 23, 2019

/assign @rtheis

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Jan 23, 2019

@rtheis: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: rtheis.

Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can be assigned and that issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time.
For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to this:

/assign @rtheis

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

andrewsykim commented Jan 23, 2019

/sig ibmcloud

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider label Jan 23, 2019
@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

andrewsykim commented Jan 24, 2019

@rtheis can we expect this to be alpha for v1.14?

@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Jan 25, 2019

@andrewsykim that's my goal.

@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

andrewsykim commented Jan 25, 2019

Thanks, going to apply the stage/milestone labels for now, feel free to ping me if it needs to change for v1.14.

/stage alpha
/milestone v1.14

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status label Jan 25, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.14 milestone Jan 25, 2019
@claurence claurence added the tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team label Jan 25, 2019
@claurence
Copy link

claurence commented Jan 25, 2019

@rtheis @spzala does this issue have a KEP associated with it yet? We want all issues to have a KEP.

@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

andrewsykim commented Jan 25, 2019

@claurence I'm writing a draft KEP for all the out-of-tree providers that are alpha/beta for v1.14. Just blocked on #703 at the moment.

@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

andrewsykim commented Jan 28, 2019

FYI put together the boiler plate for this KEP here #735

@spzala
Copy link
Member

spzala commented Jan 29, 2019

@andrewsykim thanks!! Please let's know if you need us to provide any info or review.

@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

andrewsykim commented Jan 29, 2019

@spzala there are TODOs in the IBM KEP proposed in that PR. Will need you to fill it out after the PR is merged :)

@spzala
Copy link
Member

spzala commented Jan 29, 2019

@spzala there are TODOs in the IBM KEP proposed in that PR. Will need you to fill it out after the PR is merged :)

:) thanks @andrewsykim and that sounds good.

@claurence
Copy link

claurence commented Jan 30, 2019

@rtheis @spzala since the KEP for this issue hasn't been merged yet we will be removing it from the 1.14 milestone. To have it added back in please file an exception - information on the exception process can be found here: https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/blob/master/releases/EXCEPTIONS.md

@claurence claurence removed this from the v1.14 milestone Jan 30, 2019
@claurence claurence added tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Jan 30, 2019
@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Jan 30, 2019

@claurence will do.

@spzala
Copy link
Member

spzala commented Jan 30, 2019

@claurence sounds good, thanks!

@kacole2
Copy link
Member

kacole2 commented Apr 12, 2019

Hello @rtheis @andrewsykim , I'm the Enhancement Lead for 1.15. Is this feature going to be graduating alpha/beta/stable stages in 1.15? Please let me know so it can be tracked properly and added to the spreadsheet.

Once coding begins, please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly.

@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Apr 17, 2019

@kacole2 sorry for the slow response. At most, we are targeting alpha in 1.15. I don't think there will be any k/k PRs. This work will primarily be around creating a new out-of-tree IBM cloud provider based on the current IBM cloud provider used by IBM's managed Kubernetes service.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 9, 2020
@palnabarun
Copy link
Member

palnabarun commented Sep 1, 2020

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 1, 2020
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

kikisdeliveryservice commented Sep 13, 2020

Hi @rtheis

Enhancements Lead here. Are there any plans for this 1.20?

Thanks!
Kirsten

@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Sep 14, 2020

@kikisdeliveryservice There are no 1.20 plans. Thank you.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

fejta-bot commented Dec 13, 2020

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 13, 2020
@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Dec 14, 2020

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 14, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

fejta-bot commented Mar 14, 2021

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 14, 2021
@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Mar 15, 2021

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 15, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

fejta-bot commented Jun 13, 2021

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 13, 2021
@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Jun 14, 2021

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 14, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

k8s-triage-robot commented Sep 12, 2021

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 12, 2021
@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Sep 13, 2021

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 13, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

k8s-triage-robot commented Dec 12, 2021

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 12, 2021
@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Dec 12, 2021

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 12, 2021
@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

andrewsykim commented Jan 31, 2022

@rtheis any objections to closing this issue? The original intention was to track efforts for externalizing providers back when we had provider-specific SIGs. I think this can be tracked separate from the Kubernetes KEP process now

@rtheis
Copy link

rtheis commented Jan 31, 2022

@andrewsykim no objections. You can close it.

@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

andrewsykim commented Jan 31, 2022

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Jan 31, 2022

@andrewsykim: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status tracked/out-of-tree Denotes an out-of-tree enhancement issue, which does not need to be tracked by the Release Team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests