Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the option to bind to a different address with kubectl port-forward #29678

Closed
spacepluk opened this issue Jul 27, 2016 · 9 comments · Fixed by #46517
Closed

Add the option to bind to a different address with kubectl port-forward #29678

spacepluk opened this issue Jul 27, 2016 · 9 comments · Fixed by #46517
Labels
area/kubectl priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.

Comments

@spacepluk
Copy link

Even a switch to bind to 0.0.0.0 would do the trick for me. My use case is debugging when the client needs to be in a Windows VM.

@pwittrock pwittrock added the priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. label Aug 10, 2016
@pwittrock
Copy link
Member

@spacepluk Would you be interested in implementing this feature?

Development Guide
Kubectl Code

@pwittrock
Copy link
Member

cc @pwittrock

@spacepluk
Copy link
Author

hi there, I'm a bit swamped right now but hopefully I'll have some time next week to give it a try. I already hacked the binding address to make it work for me, so it should only be a matter of figuring out how you manage the cli parameters and try to write some decent go :)

@zedfauji
Copy link

@pwittrock i would be interested in implementing this feature. will send a pull request.

@zedfauji
Copy link

@spacepluk if you have managed a workaround , it would be nice to share with the community :)

@xiangpengzhao
Copy link
Contributor

@zedfauji any updates?

There are several issues on this feature request. #43692, #36152, #40053 and this one. I'd prefer that we follow #43692 and close others.

WDYT? @thockin

@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented May 25, 2017

I don't think #43692 is what you wanted?

@xiangpengzhao
Copy link
Contributor

I'm sorry, my bad. It's #43962.

@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented May 25, 2017

MOving to #43962 as canonical bug

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/kubectl priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants