Skip to content

Add support for ppc64le architecture. #18417

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2015
Merged

Add support for ppc64le architecture. #18417

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2015

Conversation

Pensu
Copy link
Contributor

@Pensu Pensu commented Dec 9, 2015

This patch includes ppc64le arch as a valid host option.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 9, 2015

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? (reply "ok to test", or if you trust the user, reply "add to whitelist")

If this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

1 similar comment
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 9, 2015

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? (reply "ok to test", or if you trust the user, reply "add to whitelist")

If this message is too spammy, please complain to ixdy.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Labelling this PR as size/S

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 9, 2015
@roberthbailey roberthbailey added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 10, 2015
@roberthbailey
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-bot ok to test

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 10, 2015

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit 4774e71.

@Pensu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pensu commented Dec 14, 2015

@roberthbailey Hi, I am not able to understand the errors here. Could you please help me with that? TIA.

@roberthbailey
Copy link
Contributor

Here's the relevant snippet from the unit test failure (which seems unrelated to your change):

+++ [1210 06:35:02] Starting kubectl proxy
+++ [1210 06:35:02] On try 1, use proxy port 60486 if it's free

netcat isn't installed, can't verify if 127.0.0.1:60486 is free, skipping the check...

F1210 06:35:02.799440   18247 proxy.go:132] listen tcp 127.0.0.1:60486: bind: address already in use
I1210 06:35:07.522381   13642 kubelet.go:2289] skipping pod synchronization - [Failed to start ContainerManager system validation failed - Following Cgroup subsystem not mounted: [memory]]
I1210 06:35:12.523387   13642 kubelet.go:2289] skipping pod synchronization - [Failed to start ContainerManager system validation failed - Following Cgroup subsystem not mounted: [memory]]
!!! [1210 06:35:15] Timed out waiting for kubectl proxy to answer at http://127.0.0.1:60486/healthz; tried 25 waiting 0.5 between each
!!! Error in ./hack/test-cmd.sh:48
  'return 1' exited with status 1
Call stack:
  1: ./hack/test-cmd.sh:48 start-proxy(...)
  2: ./hack/test-cmd.sh:236 runTests(...)
  3: ./hack/test-cmd.sh:1270 main(...)
Exiting with status 1

@roberthbailey
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-bot unit test this

@roberthbailey
Copy link
Contributor

The logs from the e2e failure are gone, so let's try it again.

@k8s-bot test this please

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Dec 17, 2015

GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 4774e71.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

The author of this PR is not in the whitelist for merge, can one of the admins add the 'ok-to-merge' label?

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue

k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2015
Auto commit by PR queue bot
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 0641e4a into kubernetes:master Dec 18, 2015
openshift-publish-robot pushed a commit to openshift/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2018
Automatic merge from submit-queue.

UPSTREAM: 59279: nodelifecycle: set OutOfDisk unknown on node timeout

kubernetes#59279

xref https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541263

@derekwaynecarr @wjiangjay

Origin-commit: ae63a98f94d903928aee09c2b95426c4ef613d19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants