Skip to content

Disable seccomp policy by default on docker versions >= v1.10#21790

Merged
k8s-github-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes:masterfrom
vishh:seccomp
Mar 1, 2016
Merged

Disable seccomp policy by default on docker versions >= v1.10#21790
k8s-github-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes:masterfrom
vishh:seccomp

Conversation

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vishh vishh commented Feb 23, 2016

For #20870

@dchen1107: This PR might have to be included in v1.2 if we want to be docker v1.10 compatible. Kindly add a tracking label if you agree.

@vishh vishh added the sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. label Feb 23, 2016
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Labelling this PR as size/L

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 23, 2016
@k8s-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

k8s-bot commented Feb 23, 2016

GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit fc0c5c2bebf53674e84750df9e0fe9183efe3d42.

Comment thread pkg/kubelet/dockertools/manager_test.go Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: s/Unexpected/unexpected

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixing

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's not fixed...?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Err. Sorry. Went ahead and fixed it all through the file.

@yujuhong
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good overall with some nits

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Feb 24, 2016

@yujuhong: Addressed comments.

@k8s-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

k8s-bot commented Feb 24, 2016

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit a938128d5ecc0e1f6364bbb16824e53db553fa5e.

@dchen1107
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

@dchen1107 dchen1107 added this to the v1.2 milestone Feb 24, 2016
@dchen1107 dchen1107 added the priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. label Feb 24, 2016
@yujuhong
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@k8s-bot test this: issue #21834

@k8s-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

k8s-bot commented Feb 24, 2016

GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit a938128d5ecc0e1f6364bbb16824e53db553fa5e.

Signed-off-by: Vishnu kannan <vishnuk@google.com>
@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Feb 24, 2016

PTAL @yujuhong

@k8s-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

k8s-bot commented Feb 24, 2016

GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 5db37b0.

@yujuhong yujuhong added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 24, 2016
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

k8s-bot commented Feb 25, 2016

GCE e2e test build/test passed for commit 5db37b0.

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Feb 25, 2016

@k8s-bot test this github issue #21933

@k8s-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

k8s-bot commented Feb 25, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 5db37b0.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

k8s-bot commented Feb 26, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 5db37b0.

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Feb 29, 2016

@k8s-bot test this github issue #21933

@k8s-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

k8s-bot commented Feb 29, 2016

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit 5db37b0.

Please reference the list of currently known flakes when examining this failure. If you request a re-test, you must reference the issue describing the flake.

@liggitt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

liggitt commented Mar 1, 2016

cc @kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra

@vishh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

vishh commented Mar 1, 2016

@k8s-bot test this github issue #22199

@k8s-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

k8s-bot commented Mar 1, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 5db37b0.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

k8s-bot commented Mar 1, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 5db37b0.

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Automatic merge from submit-queue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants