Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move category expansion out of restmapper #43622

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 27, 2017

Conversation

deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

@deads2k deads2k commented Mar 24, 2017

RESTMapping isn't related to CategoryExpansion (the bit that expands "all" into items to be RESTMapped). This provides that separation and simplifies the RESTMapper interface.

@kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 24, 2017
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. release-note-label-needed labels Mar 24, 2017
@k8s-reviewable
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 24, 2017
@fabianofranz
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-bot verify test this

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Mar 27, 2017

@fabianofranz I suspect you're pretty close to this at the moment given the discovery changes. I think I fixed the go vet problem.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Mar 27, 2017

@k8s-bot node e2e test this

@fabianofranz
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
Needs a federation approver.
This makes me happy btw.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 27, 2017
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, fabianofranz
We suggest the following additional approver: @mwielgus

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the do-not-merge DEPRECATED. Indicates that a PR should not merge. Label can only be manually applied/removed. label Mar 27, 2017
@fabianofranz fabianofranz added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge DEPRECATED. Indicates that a PR should not merge. Label can only be manually applied/removed. release-note-label-needed labels Mar 27, 2017
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Mar 27, 2017

Needs a federation approver.

I don't think the overriding of "all" ever worked on our CLI since kubectl always preferred the shortcut expander.

@deads2k deads2k added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 27, 2017
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42087, 43383, 43622)

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit f14618a into kubernetes:master Mar 27, 2017
@deads2k deads2k deleted the cli-10-category branch August 3, 2017 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants