New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate in-tree OpenStack cloud provider #63524

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 8, 2018

Conversation

Projects
None yet
8 participants
@dims
Member

dims commented May 8, 2018

What this PR does / why we need it:

Warn operators and users to switch to the external cloud provider
for openstack.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

OpenStack built-in cloud provider is now deprecated. Please use the external cloud provider for OpenStack.
Deprecate in-tree OpenStack cloud provider
Warn operators and users to switch to the external cloud provider
for openstack.
@dims

This comment has been minimized.

Member

dims commented May 8, 2018

@hogepodge

This comment has been minimized.

Member

hogepodge commented May 8, 2018

/approve

This is in the road-map for the openstack provider.

@dklyle

This comment has been minimized.

Member

dklyle commented May 8, 2018

/approve

@ricolin

This comment has been minimized.

ricolin commented May 8, 2018

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented May 8, 2018

@ricolin: changing LGTM is restricted to assignees, and only kubernetes org members may be assigned issues.

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@j-griffith

This comment has been minimized.

j-griffith commented May 8, 2018

/LGTM

@k8s-ci-robot

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented May 8, 2018

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dims, dklyle, hogepodge, j-griffith, ricolin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dims

This comment has been minimized.

Member

dims commented May 8, 2018

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce

@k8s-merge-robot

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

k8s-merge-robot commented May 8, 2018

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 63291, 63490, 60445, 63507, 63524). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here.

@k8s-merge-robot k8s-merge-robot merged commit 084e068 into kubernetes:master May 8, 2018

16 checks passed

Submit Queue Queued to run github e2e tests a second time.
Details
cla/linuxfoundation dims authorized
Details
pull-kubernetes-bazel-build Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-bazel-test Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-cross Skipped
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-device-plugin-gpu Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gke Skipped
pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-integration Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-local-e2e Skipped
pull-kubernetes-local-e2e-containerized Skipped
pull-kubernetes-node-e2e Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-typecheck Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-verify Job succeeded.
Details
@luxas

This comment has been minimized.

Member

luxas commented May 9, 2018

Thanks @dims! Exciting stuff and thanks for executing on this important effort for the broader ecosystem!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment