New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updates kibana to 6.3.2 #67582

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 21, 2018

Conversation

Projects
None yet
6 participants
@monotek
Contributor

monotek commented Aug 20, 2018

What this PR does / why we need it:

  • updates kibana to 6.3.2

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:
needed as es was updated to 6.3.2 too in #67484

Release note:

updates kibana to 6.3.2 
@monotek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@monotek

monotek Aug 20, 2018

Contributor

/assign @coffeepac

Contributor

monotek commented Aug 20, 2018

/assign @coffeepac

@neolit123

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@neolit123

neolit123 Aug 20, 2018

Member

/ok-to-test
/sig instrumentation

Member

neolit123 commented Aug 20, 2018

/ok-to-test
/sig instrumentation

@coffeepac

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coffeepac

coffeepac Aug 20, 2018

Member

/approve

Member

coffeepac commented Aug 20, 2018

/approve

@coffeepac

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coffeepac

coffeepac Aug 20, 2018

Member

@monotek does the kibana patch version need to equal the elastic patch version?

Member

coffeepac commented Aug 20, 2018

@monotek does the kibana patch version need to equal the elastic patch version?

@coffeepac

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coffeepac

coffeepac Aug 20, 2018

Member

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-device-plugin-gpu

Member

coffeepac commented Aug 20, 2018

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-device-plugin-gpu

@monotek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@monotek

monotek Aug 20, 2018

Contributor

@coffeepac
No. At least the compatibility matrix says so: https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix#matrix_compatibility

Contributor

monotek commented Aug 20, 2018

@coffeepac
No. At least the compatibility matrix says so: https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix#matrix_compatibility

@coffeepac

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coffeepac

coffeepac Aug 20, 2018

Member

/lgtm

Member

coffeepac commented Aug 20, 2018

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm label Aug 20, 2018

@k8s-ci-robot

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@k8s-ci-robot

k8s-ci-robot Aug 20, 2018

Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: coffeepac, monotek

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Aug 20, 2018

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: coffeepac, monotek

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@fejta-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fejta-bot

fejta-bot Aug 20, 2018

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel comment for consistent failures.

fejta-bot commented Aug 20, 2018

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel comment for consistent failures.

@k8s-merge-robot

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@k8s-merge-robot

k8s-merge-robot Aug 21, 2018

Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67493, 67617, 67582, 67337). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here.

Contributor

k8s-merge-robot commented Aug 21, 2018

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67493, 67617, 67582, 67337). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here.

@k8s-merge-robot k8s-merge-robot merged commit 3f6717a into kubernetes:master Aug 21, 2018

18 checks passed

Submit Queue Queued to run github e2e tests a second time.
Details
cla/linuxfoundation monotek authorized
Details
pull-kubernetes-bazel-build Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-bazel-test Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-cross Skipped
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-100-performance Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-device-plugin-gpu Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gke Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-e2e-kubeadm-gce Skipped
pull-kubernetes-integration Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-big Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-local-e2e Skipped
pull-kubernetes-local-e2e-containerized Skipped
pull-kubernetes-node-e2e Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-typecheck Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-verify Job succeeded.
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment