New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rbd: log error when unable to get Secret #72033
rbd: log error when unable to get Secret #72033
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Alexander Trost <galexrt@googlemail.com>
|
Hi @galexrt. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/ok-to-test |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: galexrt, rootfs The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
3 similar comments
|
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
|
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
|
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/sig storage
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR makes the rbd volume driver log out the error it gets when it tries to receive the mount admin/user secret. Currently when there is for whatever reason an issue getting the secret using the
kubeClientthe user would not know why from the logged error message.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: