New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Sysctls feature gate from validation #72752

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 10, 2019

Conversation

@rajathagasthya
Copy link
Contributor

rajathagasthya commented Jan 9, 2019

What type of PR is this?

/kind api-change
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
Moves feature gate checking of Sysctls out of validation into strategy utility methods, and avoids dropping data on update if the existing pod spec and podsecuritypolicy already uses Sysctls. Adds unit test for the strategy utility methods and removes feature gate from validations.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
xref #72651

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

The `spec.SecurityContext.Sysctls` field is now dropped during creation of `Pod` objects unless the `Sysctls` feature gate is enabled.

The `spec.AllowedUnsafeSysctls` and `spec.ForbiddenSysctls` fields are now dropped during creation of `PodSecurityPolicy` objects unless the `Sysctls` feature gate is enabled.

/sig api-machinery

@k8s-ci-robot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Jan 9, 2019

Hi @rajathagasthya. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rajathagasthya

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

rajathagasthya commented Jan 9, 2019

/assign @liggitt

@liggitt

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Jan 10, 2019

one nit, lgtm otherwise

/ok-to-test

@rajathagasthya rajathagasthya force-pushed the rajathagasthya:sysctls-72651 branch from 95d9769 to 5de2d76 Jan 10, 2019

@rajathagasthya

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

rajathagasthya commented Jan 10, 2019

/retest

1 similar comment
@rajathagasthya

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

rajathagasthya commented Jan 10, 2019

/retest

@liggitt

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Jan 10, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@liggitt

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Jan 10, 2019

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Jan 10, 2019

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: liggitt, rajathagasthya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5647244 into kubernetes:master Jan 10, 2019

18 checks passed

cla/linuxfoundation rajathagasthya authorized
Details
pull-kubernetes-bazel-build Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-bazel-test Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-cross Skipped
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-100-performance Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-device-plugin-gpu Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-e2e-kubeadm-gce Skipped
pull-kubernetes-godeps Skipped
pull-kubernetes-integration Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-big Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-local-e2e Skipped
pull-kubernetes-local-e2e-containerized Skipped
pull-kubernetes-node-e2e Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-typecheck Job succeeded.
Details
pull-kubernetes-verify Job succeeded.
Details
tide In merge pool.
Details

@rajathagasthya rajathagasthya deleted the rajathagasthya:sysctls-72651 branch Jan 10, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment