Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixes a bug that connection refused error cannot be recognized correctly #81634

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 23, 2019

Conversation

likakuli
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
When listerWatcher returns a "connection refused" error, the opError.Err's type is os.SyscallError and its Error() is "connect: connection refused". So the code

time.sleep(1 * time.second) 
continue

will not be excuted forever. Thus

return nil

will be excuted and the func will return.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #
When there is a "connection refused" error, the reflector's ListAndWatch func will return directly but what expected is that sleep 1 second and rewatch since the specified resourceVersion.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Fixes a bug that when there is a "connection refused" error, the reflector's ListAndWatch func will return directly but what expected is that sleep 1 second and rewatch since the specified resourceVersion.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 20, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @likakuli. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 20, 2019
@likakuli
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @lavalamp
thank you

@likakuli
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @yliaog
This is the new pr and i have closed the old pr, thank you

@likakuli
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @liggitt
thank you

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Aug 20, 2019

suggested an alternative way to improve how robust this method is to changes in the network library. you can force push test/implementation changes to this branch without needing to open a new PR

@likakuli
Copy link
Contributor Author

suggested an alternative way to improve how robust this method is to changes in the network library. you can force push test/implementation changes to this branch without needing to open a new PR

OK, thank you for your suggestion. I will try it now

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Aug 20, 2019

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 20, 2019
@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Aug 20, 2019

/lgtm
/approve
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: liggitt, likakuli

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 20, 2019
@yliaog
Copy link
Contributor

yliaog commented Aug 20, 2019

/lgtm

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Aug 20, 2019

/uncc

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the request for review from dims August 20, 2019 22:14
@likakuli
Copy link
Contributor Author

/uncc @mfojtik

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the request for review from mfojtik August 21, 2019 03:35
@likakuli
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

if urlErr, ok := err.(*url.Error); ok {
err = urlErr.Err
}
if opErr, ok := err.(*net.OpError); ok {
Copy link
Contributor

@tedyu tedyu Aug 22, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If ok is false for any if statement, we can return, right ?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, you could get a net.OpError that is not wrapped by url.Error etc..

@@ -54,3 +54,20 @@ func IsConnectionReset(err error) bool {
}
return false
}

// Returns if the given err is "connection refused" error
func IsConnectionRefused(err error) bool {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here is another way of doing it: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-azure/blob/master/pkg/util/errors/errors.go
(not saying you have to do it that way... just fyi)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

copy that, thx

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 22a8bcf into kubernetes:master Aug 23, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.16 milestone Aug 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants