Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

/readyz should start returning failure on shutdown initiation #88911

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 6, 2020

Conversation

tkashem
Copy link
Contributor

@tkashem tkashem commented Mar 6, 2020

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
Currently, /readyz starts reporting failure after ShutdownDelayDuration elapses. The load balancer(s) uses /readyz for health check and are not aware of the shutdown initiation until ShutdownDelayDuration elapses. This does not give the load balancer(s) enough time to detect and react to it.

We expect /readyz to start returning failure as soon as apiserver shutdown is initiated(SIGTERM received). This gives the load balancer a window (defined by ShutdownDelayDuration) to detect that /readyz is red and stop sending traffic to this server.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
None

Fix /readyz to return error immediately after a shutdown is initiated, before the --shutdown-delay-duration has elapsed.

Currently, /readyz starts reporting failure after ShutdownDelayDuration
elapses. We expect /readyz to start returning failure as soon as
shutdown is initiated. This gives the load balancer a window defined by
ShutdownDelayDuration to detect that /readyz is red and stop sending
traffic to this server.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Mar 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @tkashem!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kubernetes 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kubernetes has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tkashem. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. and removed needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/apiserver sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 6, 2020
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Mar 6, 2020

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 6, 2020
@sttts sttts added the priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. label Mar 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label Mar 6, 2020
@sttts sttts added this to the v1.18 milestone Mar 6, 2020
@sttts sttts added priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. labels Mar 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Mar 6, 2020
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Mar 6, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sttts, tkashem

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Mar 6, 2020
@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Mar 6, 2020

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 6, 2020
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Mar 6, 2020

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ab40772 into kubernetes:master Mar 6, 2020
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2020
…1-upstream-release-1.17

Automated cherry pick of #88911: /readyz should start returning failure on shutdown initiation
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2020
…1-upstream-release-1.16

Automated cherry pick of #88911: /readyz should start returning failure on shutdown initiation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/apiserver cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants