New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automated cherry pick of #94489: Do not assume storageclass is still in-tree after csi #95722
Automated cherry pick of #94489: Do not assume storageclass is still in-tree after csi #95722
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ialidzhikov <i.alidjikov@gmail.com>
Hi @ialidzhikov. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/kind bug |
/ok-to-test |
/lgtm |
/cc @cheftako |
/approve |
/priority important-soon |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato, deads2k, ialidzhikov, msau42 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Cherry pick of #94489 on release-1.18.
#94489: Do not assume storageclass is still in-tree after csi
For details on the cherry pick process, see the cherry pick requests page.