Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrating pkg/kubelet/winstats to structured logging #99855

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 17, 2021

Conversation

hexxdump
Copy link
Contributor

@hexxdump hexxdump commented Mar 5, 2021

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Migrate pkg/kubelet/winstats to structured logging

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Part of #98976

Special notes for your reviewer:

NONE

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-instrumentation/1602-structured-logging

/sig node instrumentation
/priority important-soon

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup size/S sig/node do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed sig/instrumentation priority/important-soon cncf-cla: yes needs-triage labels Mar 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot commented Mar 5, 2021

Welcome @hexxdump!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kubernetes 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kubernetes has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot commented Mar 5, 2021

Hi @hexxdump. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test area/kubelet labels Mar 5, 2021
Copy link
Member

@navidshaikh navidshaikh left a comment

Copy link
Member

@ehashman ehashman left a comment

/ok-to-test
/triage accepted
/lgtm

Can you fix your release note? The field needs to start with ```release-note rather than using single backticks.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test triage/accepted and removed needs-ok-to-test needs-triage labels Mar 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm label Mar 5, 2021
@ehashman ehashman moved this from Triage to Waiting on Author in SIG Node PR Triage Mar 5, 2021
@ehashman ehashman moved this from Waiting on Author to Needs Approver in Structured Logging Migration for Kubelet, 1.21 Mar 5, 2021
@ehashman ehashman moved this from Waiting on Author to Needs Approver in SIG Node PR Triage Mar 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed labels Mar 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm label Mar 6, 2021
@navidshaikh
Copy link
Member

@navidshaikh navidshaikh commented Mar 8, 2021

@hexxdump : can you squash the commits?

Signed-off-by: Hussaina Begum Nandyala <hexxdump@gmail.com>
@hexxdump
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hexxdump hexxdump commented Mar 8, 2021

/retest

Copy link
Member

@ehashman ehashman left a comment

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm label Mar 8, 2021
@mrunalp mrunalp moved this from Needs Approver to Done in SIG Node PR Triage Mar 8, 2021
@ehashman
Copy link
Member

@ehashman ehashman commented Mar 11, 2021

/milestone v1.21

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.21 milestone Mar 11, 2021
@derekwaynecarr
Copy link
Member

@derekwaynecarr derekwaynecarr commented Mar 16, 2021

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot commented Mar 16, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: derekwaynecarr, hexxdump

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved label Mar 16, 2021
@ehashman ehashman moved this from Needs Approver to Done in Structured Logging Migration for Kubelet, 1.21 Mar 16, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

@fejta-bot fejta-bot commented Mar 17, 2021

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member

@pacoxu pacoxu commented Mar 17, 2021

/retest

2 similar comments
@hexxdump
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hexxdump hexxdump commented Mar 17, 2021

/retest

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member

@pacoxu pacoxu commented Mar 17, 2021

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 80ff14a into kubernetes:master Mar 17, 2021
13 of 14 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none and removed release-note labels Mar 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved area/kubelet cncf-cla: yes kind/cleanup lgtm ok-to-test priority/important-soon release-note-none sig/instrumentation sig/node size/S triage/accepted
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants