This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 12, 2023. It is now read-only.
[BZ#1926341] Correctly use namespace from meta.json instead of hard-coded 'openshift-migration' when adding providers #414
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926341
The namespace
openshift-rhmtvis now being used downstream, but theopenshift-migrationnamespace was hard-coded for the API request to add providers. This caused a 400 error when submitting the add provider form.This PR fixes it by using the same
META.namespacevalue we use in all other API requests so that it can be configured per deployment.