Fix: fix inputs conflict for workflow

[FogDong]

Signed-off-by: FogDong dongtianxin.tx@alibaba-inc.com

Description of your changes

Previously, if the key in inputs.parameterKey is also specified in parameter, it will cause conflict like:

  workflow:
    steps:
    - inputs:
      - from: context.name
        parameterKey: slack.message.text
      name: slack-message
      properties:
        slack:
          message:
            text: myText
          url:
            value: <url>
      type: notification

This PR update workflow vendor and resolve conflicts like this.

I have:

• Read and followed KubeVela's contribution process.
• Related Docs updated properly. In a new feature or configuration option, an update to the documentation is necessary.
• Run make reviewable to ensure this PR is ready for review.
• Added backport release-x.y labels to auto-backport this PR if necessary.

How has this code been tested

Special notes for your reviewer

cc @barnettZQG

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 58.44% // Head: 61.19% // Increases project coverage by +2.74% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (4f9ab4c) compared to base (6461625).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5251      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.44%   61.19%   +2.74%     
==========================================
  Files         280      306      +26     
  Lines       42678    45775    +3097     
==========================================
+ Hits        24942    28010    +3068     
+ Misses      15002    14868     -134     
- Partials     2734     2897     +163     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apiserver-e2etests	35.05% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
apiserver-unittests	36.90% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
core-unittests	55.22% <ø> (+0.08%)	⬆️
e2e-multicluster-test	19.22% <ø> (?)
e2e-rollout-tests	20.72% <ø> (?)
e2etests	26.14% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...kg/apiserver/infrastructure/datastore/datastore.go	64.28% <0.00%> (-14.29%)	⬇️
pkg/apiserver/interfaces/api/oam_application.go	64.28% <0.00%> (-5.11%)	⬇️
pkg/apiserver/event/sync/cr2ux.go	45.88% <0.00%> (-4.71%)	⬇️
pkg/apiserver/event/sync/store.go	69.95% <0.00%> (-3.59%)	⬇️
pkg/apiserver/domain/service/oam_application.go	84.61% <0.00%> (-3.30%)	⬇️
pkg/appfile/dryrun/dryrun.go	44.24% <0.00%> (-2.66%)	⬇️
...server/infrastructure/datastore/kubeapi/kubeapi.go	62.60% <0.00%> (-0.84%)	⬇️
pkg/apiserver/domain/service/application.go	57.83% <0.00%> (-0.21%)	⬇️
...dev/v1alpha2/applicationconfiguration/workloads.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...am.dev/v1alpha2/applicationconfiguration/helper.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 98 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[barnettZQG]

lgtm