New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migration to ActiveJob #208

Closed
mfenner opened this Issue Dec 29, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@mfenner
Member

mfenner commented Dec 29, 2014

No description provided.

@mfenner mfenner added the feature label Dec 29, 2014

mfenner pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2014

mfenner pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2014

mfenner pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2014

mfenner pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2014

mfenner pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2014

@mfenner

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mfenner

mfenner Jan 1, 2015

Member

With ActiveJob we loose some of the functionality of delayed_job, in particular the priority of jobs. Sidekiq does the priority by queue, and that works with ActiveJob.

Member

mfenner commented Jan 1, 2015

With ActiveJob we loose some of the functionality of delayed_job, in particular the priority of jobs. Sidekiq does the priority by queue, and that works with ActiveJob.

@mfenner mfenner closed this Jan 1, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment