Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for LiteSpeed server #2622

Open
jcmartinez opened this issue Sep 29, 2020 · 14 comments
Open

Support for LiteSpeed server #2622

jcmartinez opened this issue Sep 29, 2020 · 14 comments
Labels
feature Requesting that Lando do something new

Comments

@jcmartinez
Copy link

Please explain your request and its importance in the form of a user story.

As a lando user who works with Drupal sites that have high traffic, I would like to develop using the LiteSpeed or OpenLiteSpeed web server instead of using Apche or Nginx

Please provide some detail on how lando can help solve this problem

Provide an option for using the Drupal recipe via LiteSpeed.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Even though LiteSpeed is very compatible with Apache, using the actual software that's used in production helps avoiding many questions when debugging. I also suspect that using LiteSpeed for development with Lando, instead of using Apache, would take less resources. I haven't test this assumption though.

Describe the solution you'd like

name: mysite
recipe: drupal8
config:
  via: openlitespeed

Describe alternatives you've considered

The most obvious alternative is to use Apache and hope there are no differences.
Another alternative would be using a custom recipe with a LiteSpeed container; however, I haven't tried that.

@jcmartinez jcmartinez added the feature Requesting that Lando do something new label Sep 29, 2020
@pirog pirog added this to New Plugins in External Plugins Dec 28, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 27, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions and please check out this if you are wondering why we auto close issues.

@stale stale bot added the stale Issue has been auto-flagged as stale label Apr 27, 2021
@davidpp
Copy link

davidpp commented Aug 2, 2021

Came here while Googling for Lando with Litespeed

@danplaton4
Copy link

Is this taken into consideration?
+1 for LiteSpeed integration

@stale stale bot removed the stale Issue has been auto-flagged as stale label Feb 18, 2022
@klonos
Copy link

klonos commented Mar 2, 2022

+1 from me as well.

@yorkshire-pudding
Copy link

+1 from me as well

@cafesk8
Copy link

cafesk8 commented Apr 9, 2022

+1 as well ... using OLS in docker, thats the only reason why I dont switch to Lando full-time

@f-liva
Copy link

f-liva commented Jun 1, 2022

+1 OLS is neccessary at today time

@klonos
Copy link

klonos commented Jan 15, 2023

Here's some usage data from our Telemetry page:

Web Server

Value Count Percentage
Other 13 4%
nginx 33 11%
LiteSpeed 36 12%
Apache 217 73%

It seems that LiteSpeed is as popular as nginx.

@danharper83
Copy link

+1 from me. Developing a mixture of Drupal and Wordpress.

@broskees
Copy link

+1 from me.

@delacosta456
Copy link

will also love this ..+1

@sacreol
Copy link

sacreol commented Oct 6, 2023

+1 from me.

@stefanoginella
Copy link

Another +1 here :)

@ronald2wing
Copy link

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Requesting that Lando do something new
Projects
External Plugins
New Plugins
Development

No branches or pull requests