Carson T. Schütze: The empirical base of linguistics
Switch branches/tags
Nothing to show
Clone or download
Fetching latest commit…
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Permalink
Failed to load latest commit information.
bod
chapters
createspace
docs
drafts
figures
langsci
lsp-fonts
.gitignore
Makefile
README.md
Schutze_frontcover.pdf
backmatter.tex
biblatex-sp-unified.bbx
bodcover.pdf
bodcover.tex
cover.png
lengths.tex
localbibliography.bib
localcommands.sty
localcounters.sty
localhyphenation.sty
localindex.OLD.tex
localindex.tex
localmetadata.sty
localpackages.sty
lsp-cgloss.sty
lsp-gb4e.sty
lsp-makros.sty
main.pdf
main.tex
newtxmath.sty
unified.bst

README.md

The Empirical Base of Linguistics

Publication Info

  • Author: Carson T. Schütze
  • Publication Date: 2016-02-23
  • Series: Classics
  • Volume: 2

Description

Throughout much of the history of linguistics, grammaticality judgments – intuitions about the well-formedness of sentences – have constituted most of the empirical base against which theoretical hypothesis have been tested. Although such judgments often rest on subtle intuitions, there is no systematic methodology for eliciting them, and their apparent instability and unreliability have led many to conclude that they should be abandoned as a source of data.

Carson T. Schütze presents here a detailed critical overview of the vast literature on the nature and utility of grammaticality judgments and other linguistic intuitions, and the ways they have been used in linguistic research. He shows how variation in the judgment process can arise from factors such as biological, cognitive, and social differences among subjects, the particular elicitation method used, and extraneous features of the materials being judged. He then assesses the status of judgments as reliable indicators of a speaker's grammar.

Integrating substantive and methodological findings, Schütze proposes a model in which grammaticality judgments result from interaction of linguistic competence with general cognitive processes. He argues that this model provides the underpinning for empirical arguments to show that once extragrammatical variance is factored out, universal grammar succumbs to a simpler, more elegant analysis than judgment data initially lead us to expect. Finally, Schütze offers numerous practical suggestions on how to collect better and more useful data. The result is a work of vital importance that will be required reading for linguists, cognitive psychologists, and philosophers of language alike.

URL

Book page on langsci-press.org

License

Copyright: (c) 2016, the author.

All data, code and documentation in this repository is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence (CC BY 4.0).