Skip to content

[9.x] Added --only-vendor option to route:list command#42549

Merged
taylorotwell merged 1 commit intolaravel:9.xfrom
ash-jc-allen:feature/route-list-only-vendor
May 28, 2022
Merged

[9.x] Added --only-vendor option to route:list command#42549
taylorotwell merged 1 commit intolaravel:9.xfrom
ash-jc-allen:feature/route-list-only-vendor

Conversation

@ash-jc-allen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hey! This PR is only a small one but I think it could be useful. It adds a new --only-vendor option that you can use when calling the route:list command. If you use this option, only the vendor routes will be output in the terminal (your own application's routes will be ignored).

This is example of what it would look like:

Screenshot 2022-05-28 at 00 46 46

I think this is something that could be pretty handy because it gives you a quick insight into any routes that you aren't aware of that might have been registered by packages.

I know in the past that I've installed packages in my projects and only realised further down the line that they're registering routes (usually for a feature that I'm not needing). So, by having this, it'd make it easier to "audit" (for lack of a better term) my project and make sure I've not got any open routes that are expecting authorisation or authentication to be added to them (via a service provider, config, etc).

By the way, I did consider adding some validation to check that the --only-vendor and --except-vendor flags weren't passed at the same time. But, it looks like if you do that anyway, you'll get the following error message: Your application doesn't have any routes matching the given criteria. which sort of covers the base already. If you think a specific error message would be better for this situation, I'd be happy to add it.

If this is something that you might consider merging, please let me know if any changes need making 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants