Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove domain and ranges from bf:appliedMaterial and bf:baseMaterial #24

Closed
sfolsom opened this issue Jun 26, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed
Labels
domain/range semantic changes to rdfs:domain, rdfs:range, owl changes, etc. under review Work begins on issue; incl. questions, consultations, or BFC review.

Comments

@sfolsom
Copy link

sfolsom commented Jun 26, 2018

Justification: Removing the domain bf:Instance will allow the possibility to assert on bf:Items materials that that are not the same as an "ideal" bf:Instance. The ranges should remain unspecified to allow for use with materials vocabularies (e.g. Getty AAT) that do not declare their terms to be of type Material.

[This recommendation was made on behalf of the LD4P Art & Rare Materials BIBFRAME Ontology Extension (https://github.com/LD4P/arm).]

@raydAtLC raydAtLC added semantic changes to rdfs:domain, rdfs:range, owl changes, etc. under review Work begins on issue; incl. questions, consultations, or BFC review. labels Aug 9, 2018
@kefo kefo closed this as completed Jun 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
domain/range semantic changes to rdfs:domain, rdfs:range, owl changes, etc. under review Work begins on issue; incl. questions, consultations, or BFC review.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants