New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
15b training update #2192
Comments
nice job, could you arrange a test match on http://zero.sjeng.org/? @roy7 |
It seems to be approximately on par vs LZ157 with half visits: I tested just a 3 games at 100 vs 200 visits and 1 game at 1000 vs 2000 visits, and they were all very balanced for a long time (which is probably more indicative of the balanced result that the brut score of 3 to 1 for this new net). |
i dont think its needed to test against lz157, we already know its stronger |
Could anyone help put it in Baidu pan? Dropbox is banned in China. |
@pangafu from leela master uses google drive, see : https://github.com/pangafu/LeelaMasterWeight try google drive i suggest |
google also is band in cn. |
Thanks, at limited time ,It is stronger than LZ205 |
10 days passed since last one, do you have a stronger weight? |
starting from lz 204, lz stops the 3-3 at move 3 (a lot less), and prefers to adjacent 4-4 at move 3 instead, like in normal human games so i am looking forward to next 15b versions trained on lz 204 and higher |
@alreadydone pls help to upload to pan.baidu |
@l1t1 is there another site that doesn't need cell phone? |
@barrtgt https://userscloud.com/ |
I modified the minigo script (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tensorflow/minigo/master/sgf/opening_stats.sh)
and use
|
if use code to rotate the board,
the result
|
thanks @alreadydone |
i use sgfs of lz206 vs lz205 (http://zero.sjeng.org/match-games/5c754b51f06758029e912f22)
|
I think it's just me, gcp, and bjiyxo. Can you let me know which specific network(s) you want tested and vs what hashes? Thanks. |
I'd say test both of bubblesld's networks (93a5281b and 0a963117) against f438268e. |
I put 0a96 on my best pc(2x1070+1x1060), lz15b0a96_3ghwj, perform better than all 40b networks using the same hardware on CGOS. |
who knows the config of Rnz-3.2.7-d3gp on cgos |
@TFiFiE Tests scheduled. |
why the hash code changed? |
-p 0 -v 1600 -r 5 -m 0 -t 1 -d --noponder parameter seems at low visits to 15b weight |
build KataGo client on windows is no proble, do you mean the server? |
My server is with ubuntu. |
I was able to compile KataGo. Would you be interested in a compiled version for Ubuntu to try it out? |
I know little about linux. I thought that it has to be built for each machine. But I can certainly give it a try. |
"b4d5e8b6 I made this net available for play on KGS, as LeelaZeroT |
For the record: On ogs, 15bTurboLeela also runs this net. |
bubblesld, do you still train 15b nets? |
currently I am training 40b, SE-40b, 20b. Hope to get a stronger 20b this week, and switch 20b to 15b. |
Maybe the another one, for example 15b-264-600k , can win over 55% in the official test. |
it is so strict that the new net should pass both in official test and your own test. |
2020/4/9 b7ccd6b4 2020/4/10 |
The last one 0c4ade79 seems really nice, setting quite a gap for its rivals. Have anyone tested it for blind spots? |
@melox1 "The last one 0c4ade79 seems really nice, setting quite a gap for its rivals. " Started the run on KGS as LeelaZeroT |
I can not find the best network 6b (for Leela Zero), strongest network trained like 15b. |
Is it theoretically possible apply this same method with katago? training the s167 15b using the s509 40b |
Is it time to train for v278? |
Are the versions available which are referred by this project: https://github.com/inclement/LazyBaduk (see: "[...] 15x192 network, from July 2018, in order to try to be as fast as practical on a phone") ? |
@bubblesld wonsik made this script to train katago using a linux server https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1VsolGGLI-NsDHaLc-AzFJ_LuU95w8EPa?usp=sharing |
I train the 15b weight on 40b self-games from time to time. I will update the weight here when it beats the previous best in my test.
2019/2/3
edb61bc2
trained up to v202
60:40 over f438268e
2019/2/25
0a963117
trained up to v204
104:96 over edb61bc2
2019/5/7
da045f91
trained up to v224
227:173 over edb61bc2
211:189 in the official test.
2019/5/12
9006c708
trained up to v224 with elfv2
224:176 over da045f91
226:188 in the official test.
2019/5/17
3d7769e9
trained up to v225
223:177 over 9006c708
154:159 in the official test.
2019/5/23
40ea1748
trained up to v226
220:180 over 9006c708
209:190 in the official test.
2019/5/24
99a8d3a3
trained up to v226 (later version)
226:174 over 9006c708
115:132 in the official test.
2019/5/31
eef9843d
trained up to v226 (later version)
218:182 over 9006c708
190:176 in the official test.
2019/7/2
c9fd870f
trained up to v229
226:174 over 9006c708
233:189 in the official test.
2019/7/4
64e1f2ca
trained up to v229 (later version)
222:178 over c9fd870f
184:174 in the official test
2019/8/8
c11bc844
trained up to v234
235:165 over c9fd870f
232:185 in the official test
2019/8/9
5ee55afe
trained up to v234 (later version)
223:177 over c11bc844
133:148 in the official test
2019/9/1
53a5fe93
trained up to v238
223:177 over c11bc844
255:145 in the official test
2019/9/29
3d056bf4
trained up to v244
221:179 over 53a5fe93
137:143 in the official test
2019/10/3
2be1fc26
trained up to v245
220:180 over 53a5fe93
176:172 in the official test
2019/10/14
9c948dc4
trained up to v245 (another run)
216:184 over 53a5fe93
119:137 in the official test
2019/10/15
0d2694c5
trained up to v245 (later version)
229:171 over 53a5fe93
232:189 in the official test
2019/11/7
9273d548
trained up to v249
223:177 over 0d2694c5
217:192 in the official test
2019/11/10
a4b58a91
trained up to v249 (with more self-play games from v249)
219:181 over 0d2694c5
230:192 in the official test (220:180 at game 400).
2020/1/1
b4d5e8b6
trained up to v257
216:184 over a4b58a91
183:176 in the official test
2020/3/15
006eff16
trained up to v264
220:180 over a4b58a91
180:171 in the official test
2020/3/20
0c41abff
trained up to v266
220:180 over a4b58a91
183:178 in the official test
2020/3/21
da46e3b9
trained up to v266 (later version)
221:179 over a4b58a91
128:138 in the official test
2020/3/23
e912b007
trained up to v266 (later version)
218:182 over a4b58a91
169:166 in the official test
2020/3/28
ad865426
trained up to v266 (policy x4)
216:184 over a4b58a91
231:191 in the official test
2020/4/5
f5010dbd
trained up to v270
225:175 over a4b58a91
217:197 in the official test
2020/4/9
3353f154
trained up to v270 (later version)
227:173 over a4b58a91
202:179 in the official test
b7ccd6b4
trained up to v270 (later version)
221:179 over a4b58a91
176:174 in the official test
2020/4/10
0c4ade79
trained up to v270 (later version)
235:165 over a4b58a91
230:170 in the official test
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: