Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update bsdtar --owner and --group support #278

Closed
kwrobot opened this issue Apr 11, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Update bsdtar --owner and --group support #278

kwrobot opened this issue Apr 11, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@kwrobot
Copy link

kwrobot commented Apr 11, 2015

Original issue 167 created by kientzle on 2011-08-14T17:52:36.000Z:

GNU tar recently extended --owner and --group to support arbitrary names and ID values, for creating archives on systems with dissimilar user bases.  It's a nice idea and one that bsdtar should probably support.

Begin forwarded message:

From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: August 13, 2011 10:29:23 AM PDT
To: Thayne Harbaugh <thayne.l.h@gmail.com>
Cc: 136231@bugs.debian.org, bug-tar@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Bug-tar] Failure with --owner and --group when names cannot be    mapped to IDs

tar: --owner and --group names and numbers
The --owner and --group options now accept operands of the form
NAME:NUM, so that you can specify both symbolic name and numeric
ID for owner and group.  Also, in these options, NAME no longer
needs to be present in the current host's user and group
databases; this implements Debian enhancement request 136231
<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=136231> reported
by Mark W. Eichin, communicated by Thayne Harbaugh to bug-tar in
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2011-08/msg00001.html>.

@kwrobot
Copy link
Author

kwrobot commented Apr 11, 2015

Comment #1 originally posted by kientzle on 2011-11-24T19:59:18.000Z:

bsdtar already has --gid, --gname, --uid, --uname options that provide the same functionality.  If someone wants to implement GNU tar-compatible --owner and --group options, I'm happy to review patches, but this isn't a priority for me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant