Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Trac #776 Implement GEOSMinimumClearance and GEOSMinimumClearanceLine #65

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Trac #776 Implement GEOSMinimumClearance and GEOSMinimumClearanceLine #65

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

dbaston
Copy link
Member

@dbaston dbaston commented Apr 24, 2016 •
edited
Loading

@dbaston dbaston changed the title Implement GEOSMinimumClearance and GEOSMinimumClearanceLine Trac #776 Implement GEOSMinimumClearance and GEOSMinimumClearanceLine Apr 24, 2016
@strk
Copy link
Member

strk commented Apr 25, 2016

Are the Last Port informations correct ? Do you have any more detail about the actual version (like git commit) ?

strk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2016
Implement GEOSMinimumClearance and GEOSMinimumClearanceLine
6741c5e 
Includes tests and C-API exposure.

Patch by Daniel Baston <dbaston@maponics.com>
via #65

Closes #776

git-svn-id: http://svn.osgeo.org/geos/trunk@4203 5242fede-7e19-0410-aef8-94bd7d2200fb
@strk
Copy link
Member

strk commented Apr 25, 2016

Anyway, pushed r4203 = 6741c5e (refs/remotes/trunk)

@strk strk closed this Apr 25, 2016
@dbaston
Copy link
Member Author

dbaston commented Apr 25, 2016

Hash is f6187ee22aee29933c561284e1cb56df32fddcc0 on the copy of JTS I had checked out when I did this work. Thanks for the quick review!

@pramsey pramsey mentioned this pull request Nov 14, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@dbaston @strk