WAP 321 Platform/OS identification #5172

Closed
guoming218 opened this Issue Dec 15, 2016 · 4 comments

Projects

None yet

2 participants

@guoming218
guoming218 commented Dec 15, 2016 edited

I have 4 WAP 321 being polled by libreNMS.
One thing that i notices is the one running firmware Version 1.0.6.2 detected as a Linux OS/Platform
The other 3 APs is running on firmware Version 1.0.0.3 detected as Cisco Wireless Acess Point
WAP321-E-K9 which is correct.
How can I correct it?

Component Version
LibreNMS 969b963
DB Schema 152
PHP 7.0.8-0ubuntu0.16.04.3
MySQL 10.0.28-MariaDB-0ubuntu0.16.04.1
RRDTool 1.5.5
SNMP NET-SNMP 5.7.3

DO NOT DELETE THIS INFORMATION.

Please read this information carefully.

GitHub issues is for feature requests or bugs, please do not post issues asking for help or how to do X, Y or Z.
You can use our irc channel ##librenms on freenode to ask questions or our community site.

  • Is your install up to date? Updating your install
    Please do not submit an issue if your install is not up to date within the last 24 hours or on a stable monthly release.
  • Please include all of the information between the ==================================== section of ./validate.php.
  • If you would like us to add a new device or your device is listed as Generic then please provide the information asked for here
  • Please provide as much detail as possible.
@laf
Member
laf commented Dec 15, 2016

You've not provided any of the information asked for above

@laf laf closed this Dec 16, 2016
@guoming218

Hi laf,

What other stuff do i need to add here?
thks

guoming

@laf
Member
laf commented Dec 16, 2016

Point 3 above please.

@laf laf reopened this Dec 16, 2016
@guoming218

details.txt

session.txt

Hi laf,

as requested:) thks for your help.

guoming

@laf laf added the New-Device label Dec 17, 2016
@laf laf added a commit to laf/librenms that referenced this issue Dec 26, 2016
@laf laf newdevice: Added additional detection for Cisco WAP 321 #5172 a31158e
@Rosiak Rosiak closed this in #5248 Dec 28, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment