Extra VLAN mapping in bridge FDB module to fix ProCurve #11230
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The FDB discovery process cannot currently get the VLANs for FDB entries on ProCurve switches. This is because ProCurve does not use actual VLAN numbers to index the dot1qTpFdbTable, which is what the default code assumes. Instead, the indices must be further looked up against dot1qVlanFdbId in dot1qVlanCurrentTable to map them to an actual VLAN number.
This is a redo of PR #11132 which I messed up.
Please note
Testers
If you would like to test this pull request then please run:
./scripts/github-apply <pr_id>
, i.e./scripts/github-apply 5926
After you are done testing, you can remove the changes with
./scripts/github-remove
. If there are schema changes, you can ask on discord how to revert.