Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lightning Specification Meeting 2020/02/17 #735

Open
cdecker opened this issue Jan 31, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Lightning Specification Meeting 2020/02/17 #735

cdecker opened this issue Jan 31, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@cdecker
Copy link
Collaborator

@cdecker cdecker commented Jan 31, 2020

The meeting will take place on Monday 2020/02/17 on IRC #lightning-dev. It is open to the public.

Pull Request Review

  • Bolt 1: Specify that extensions to existing messages must use TLV #714
    • Shall we make TLV the only extension mechanism, and how do we work around non-mandatory fields that are not TLV fields (e.g., option_upfront_shutdown_script)
  • BOLT 1: add networks to init message. #682
  • A home for BOLT #738
  • [ ] Reply channel range simplification #737
    • Adds details to the spec which were interpreted differently by the implementations.
  • [ ] BOLT11 additional and negative tests #736
  • Avoid stuck channels after fee increase #740
    • Add some additional constraints to the fee-paying party to guarantee the ability to add an HTLC even in the presence of a 2x feerate spike.

Long Term Updates

- [ ] Protocol testing framework (@rustyrussell). See the tools/ and tests/events directories in lightning-rfc-protocol-test for details.

  • Poor man's rendez-vous routing (@t-bast). See mail by t-bast and gist for details. (Since this is a fresh proposal still in everybody's mind this moved up the list to minimize loss of context).

Backlog

The following are topics that we should discuss at some point, so if we have time to discuss them great, otherwise they slip to the next meeting.

- [ ] Current status of the trampoline routing proposal (@t-bast)
- [ ] How can we improve the gossip (gossip_queries_ex)? (@sstone )


Post-Meeting notes:

Action items

The full logs can be found here

@t-bast t-bast changed the title Lightning Specification Meeting 2020/03/17 Lightning Specification Meeting 2020/02/17 Jan 31, 2020
@t-bast

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

@t-bast t-bast commented Feb 14, 2020

Could we also look at #714 which is carrying over from last time? I updated the PR but didn't get reviews yet. I'm hoping that the first three reviews (#738, #737 and #736 could be done fairly quickly, but maybe I'm overly optimistic).

@darosior

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@darosior darosior commented Feb 15, 2020

Maybe #682 too ?.. Since interop testing has already been done it shouldn't be long

@cdecker

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@cdecker cdecker commented Feb 16, 2020

Ok, added both to the agenda, and I also added a brief summary of where we are with the various things.

@cdecker cdecker pinned this issue Feb 16, 2020
@joostjager

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

@joostjager joostjager commented Feb 17, 2020

Short update on anchor format now that we've decided to not to symmetric csv (yet): #688 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.