lightningnetwork / lnd Public
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
travis: staged builds #3794
Merged
Merged
travis: staged builds #3794
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
d1d7f22
to
23961cc
Compare
wpaulino
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2019
joostjager
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2019
I'm no connaisseur of travis config files, but the output definitely looks great!
Remove 'experiment' from commit msg |
This PR introduces staging to our travis pipeline. Currently all instances perform: - compilation of lnd - linting - compilation and installation of btcd binaries - installation of bitcoind binaries In total this adds about 3 minutes to each of our 5 instances, resulting in roughly 12 minutes of redundant execution time. Additionally, if if a build fails to compile or lint we detect this 5 separate times, consuming precious instances from other builds. We alleviate this by adding an initial Build phase, which runs a single instance performing the actions above. This has the benefit of quickly sanity checking the pr before moving on to the more expensive unit or integration test suites, and failing faster for common mistakes. It also warms up the build caches for the Test stage in one fell swoop. For instance, if 5 people push changes at the same time, they can all get immediate feedback regarding compilation or linting issues, and potentially save hours waiting for other people's test to finish or fail before finding out they had a spelling error. This doesn't alleviate all possible issues, e.g. the 5 instances may already be consumed by test suites, but it does make a sizable step towards minimizing time-to-failure in common scenarios.
moved pr body to commit message, will merge once the build finishes |
Here's the link I consulted https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/build-stages/ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
This PR introduces staging to our travis pipeline. Currently all instances perform:
In total this adds about 3 minutes to each of our 5 instances, resulting in roughly 12 minutes of redundant execution time. Additionally, if if a build fails to compile or lint we detect this 5 separate times, consuming precious instances from other builds.
We alleviate this by adding an initial
Build
phase, which runs a single instance performing the actions above. This has the benefit of quickly sanity checking the pr before moving on to the more expensive unit or integration test suites, and failing faster for common mistakes. It also warms up the build caches for theTest
stage in one fell swoop.For instance, if 5 people push changes at the same time, they can all get immediate feedback regarding compilation or linting issues, and potentially save hours waiting for other people's test to finish or fail before finding out they had a spelling error. This doesn't alleviate all possible issues, e.g. the 5 instances may already be consumed by test suites, but it does make a sizable step towards minimizing time-to-failure in common scenarios.