Skip to content

refactor: use maps.Copy for cleaner map handling - #9630

Merged
bhandras merged 1 commit into
lightningnetwork:masterfrom
xinhangzhou:master
Mar 28, 2025
Merged

bhandras merged 1 commit into
lightningnetwork:masterfrom
xinhangzhou:master

Conversation

@xinhangzhou

@xinhangzhou xinhangzhou commented Mar 24, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change Description

Use the built-in methods from the standard library to simplify the code.

The same as btcsuite/btcd#2343

Steps to Test

Steps for reviewers to follow to test the change.

Pull Request Checklist

Testing

  • Your PR passes all CI checks.
  • Tests covering the positive and negative (error paths) are included.
  • Bug fixes contain tests triggering the bug to prevent regressions.

Code Style and Documentation

📝 Please see our Contribution Guidelines for further guidance.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Comment thread accessman.go
for peerPub, count := range counts {
a.peerCounts[peerPub] = count
}
maps.Copy(a.peerCounts, counts)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you looked into how such refactor could be applied to the whole codebase perhaps?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I conducted a check, and the other several that seem to meet the criteria are all of slice type. Currently, I can find these few instances.

@bhandras bhandras Mar 24, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there are a couple more. Perhaps would you mind examining the output of this program and fix those too for completeness? https://github.com/bhandras/mapsearch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! The program you provided is very useful!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's still a few left afaict, could you please add those too?

Comment thread accessman.go
for peerPub, count := range counts {
a.peerCounts[peerPub] = count
}
maps.Copy(a.peerCounts, counts)

@bhandras bhandras Mar 24, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there are a couple more. Perhaps would you mind examining the output of this program and fix those too for completeness? https://github.com/bhandras/mapsearch

@bhandras

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Also could you please make sure that you update the change log?

@xinhangzhou xinhangzhou changed the title refactor: use map.Copy for cleaner map handling refactor: use maps.Copy for cleaner map handling Mar 24, 2025
@xinhangzhou

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Also could you please make sure that you update the change log?

Thank you for your guidance. I have replaced everything, and please review it again. However, I couldn't find the changelog file.

@bhandras

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Also could you please make sure that you update the change log?

Thank you for your guidance. I have replaced everything, and please review it again. However, I couldn't find the changelog file.

The changelog is here: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/blob/master/docs/release-notes/release-notes-0.19.0.md

@xinhangzhou

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Also could you please make sure that you update the change log?

Thank you for your guidance. I have replaced everything, and please review it again. However, I couldn't find the changelog file.

The changelog is here: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/blob/master/docs/release-notes/release-notes-0.19.0.md

Thanks. Add the changelog. Please review again.

@xinhangzhou

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sorry to bother you, but there's another thing I would like to consult you about: I proposed an optimization using max/min to simplify the code at #9632. Should I submit two PRs as I am now, or should I merge it into one with the current one?

@guggero guggero left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the change.

Comment thread lnwire/custom_records.go Outdated
Comment thread lnwire/custom_records.go
Comment thread docs/release-notes/release-notes-0.19.0.md Outdated
Signed-off-by: xinhangzhou <shuangcui@aliyun.com>
@bhandras
bhandras merged commit b6cf1bc into lightningnetwork:master Mar 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants