introduce default type serializers #356
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #264.
Maybe this is a solution?
typeoption has been renamed toserializertypeis now one of the primitive constructors (Boolean,String,Number,ObjectorArray) if setAttributeSerializerhas been renamed toComplexAttributeSerializerAttributeTypehas been renamed toAttributeSerializerAttributeTypeis a type alias for the basic primitive constructorsThis would reduce some confusion, especially for those coming from Polymer, as the type system will be almost the same (there is no support for
Date). Additionally, much of the content out there about lit mistakenly usestype: Objectoften, so this alone tells me people are assuming that is the correct syntax already.Examples:
When using something like
type: Object, the following occurs:If you have better ideas or other plans, im happy to close, just figured i'd push this since I had it.
cc @sorvell