Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore(probes): Make probe retry optional in crds to support value 0 (retries) AND rename defaultAppHealthCheck #424

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 6, 2022

Conversation

uditgaurav
Copy link
Member

@uditgaurav uditgaurav commented Sep 30, 2022

Signed-off-by: uditgaurav udit@chaosnative.com

What this PR does / why we need it:

  • Make probe retry optional in crds to support value 0 (retries)
  • Rename DefaultAppHealthCheck to DefaultHealthCheck

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • Fixes #
  • Labelled this PR & related issue with documentation tag
  • PR messages has document related information
  • Labelled this PR & related issue with breaking-changes tag
  • PR messages has breaking changes related information
  • Labelled this PR & related issue with requires-upgrade tag
  • PR messages has upgrade related information
  • Commit has unit tests
  • Commit has integration tests

…retries)

Signed-off-by: uditgaurav <udit@chaosnative.com>
Signed-off-by: uditgaurav <udit@chaosnative.com>
@uditgaurav uditgaurav changed the title Chore(probes): Make probe retry optional in crds to support value 0 (retries) Chore(probes): Make probe retry optional in crds to support value 0 (retries) AND rename defaultAppHealthCheck Sep 30, 2022
@ispeakc0de ispeakc0de merged commit d789855 into litmuschaos:master Oct 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants