Skip to content
🔜
working on that thing you asked about
🔜
working on that thing you asked about
GitHub Sponsor
Block or report user

Report or block ljharb

Hide content and notifications from this user.

Learn more about blocking users

Contact Support about this user’s behavior.

Learn more about reporting abuse

Report abuse
Block or report user

Report or block ljharb

Hide content and notifications from this user.

Learn more about blocking users

Contact Support about this user’s behavior.

Learn more about reporting abuse

Report abuse

Pinned

  1. JavaScript Style Guide

    JavaScript 89.9k 17.4k

  2. Node Version Manager - POSIX-compliant bash script to manage multiple active node.js versions

    Shell 37.7k 3.6k

  3. ECMAScript 5 compatibility shims for legacy (and modern) JavaScript engines

    JavaScript 6.8k 917

  4. A querystring parser with nesting support

    JavaScript 4.6k 409

  5. Tracking ECMAScript Proposals

    8.9k 339

  6. 1
    While attempting to explain JavaScript's `reduce` method on arrays, conceptually, I came up with the following - hopefully it's helpful; happy to tweak it if anyone has suggestions.
    2
    
                  
    3
    ## Intro
    4
    JavaScript Arrays have lots of built in methods on their prototype. Some of them *mutate* - ie, they change the underlying array in-place. Luckily, most of them do not - they instead return an entirely distinct array. Since arrays are conceptually a contiguous list of items, it helps code clarity and maintainability a lot to be able to operate on them in a "functional" way. (I'll also insist on referring to an array as a "list" - although in some languages, `List` is a native data type, in JS and this post, I'm referring to the concept. Everywhere I use the word "list" you can assume I'm talking about a JS Array) This means, to perform a single operation on the list as a whole ("atomically"), and to return a *new* list - thus making it much simpler to think about both the old list and the new one, what they contain, and what happened during the operation.
    5
    
                  

Contribution activity in LEMUR Heavy Industries

October 2019

ljharb has no activity in LEMUR Heavy Industries yet for this period.

September 2019

Created an issue in lemurheavy/coveralls-public that received 4 comments

coverage status not set; one job says "no data"

See airbnb/enzyme#2221 The coverage status isn't being set - although on prior pushes, it was successfully being set. I think I may have caused a f…

4 comments

Seeing something unexpected? Take a look at the GitHub profile guide.

You can’t perform that action at this time.