From 9512d6d2133a15a3e6272cbadd7fbb479011ccdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: XDeme <66138117+XDeme@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:57:56 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Fix parsing of `operator<() {}` (#75144) Fixes #74876. During the parsing of `operator<(Foo&) {}`, there was no handling for the operator<, so it called `consumeToken()` again, causing the `AnnotationParser::Scopes` to have one additional left brace each time it tried to parse it, leaving it unbalanced. Because of this, in the following code: ```cpp class Foo { void operator<(Foo&) {} Foo& f; }; ``` The `&` in the reference member, was being interpreted as `TT_BinaryOperator` instead of `TT_PointerOrReference`. --- clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp | 4 ++++ clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp index febd6830eca1e..f3551af342439 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp @@ -164,6 +164,10 @@ class AnnotatingParser { TT_OverloadedOperatorLParen))) { return false; } + if (Previous.Previous->is(tok::kw_operator) && + CurrentToken->is(tok::l_paren)) { + return false; + } } FormatToken *Left = CurrentToken->Previous; diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp index 65b1f0f4b5765..8e6935319b2f3 100644 --- a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp +++ b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp @@ -298,6 +298,17 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsUsesOfStarAndAmp) { ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 12u) << Tokens; EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[2], tok::identifier, TT_TypeName); EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::star, TT_PointerOrReference); + + Tokens = annotate("class Foo {\n" + " void operator<() {}\n" + " Foo &f;\n" + "};"); + ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 17u) << Tokens; + EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::kw_operator, TT_FunctionDeclarationName); + EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[5], tok::less, TT_OverloadedOperator); + EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[6], tok::l_paren, TT_OverloadedOperatorLParen); + EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[8], tok::l_brace, TT_FunctionLBrace); + EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[11], tok::amp, TT_PointerOrReference); } TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsUsesOfPlusAndMinus) {