Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

llvm-gcc4 lacks link-time-optimization support #1241

Closed
lattner opened this issue Aug 6, 2006 · 1 comment
Closed

llvm-gcc4 lacks link-time-optimization support #1241

lattner opened this issue Aug 6, 2006 · 1 comment
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla llvm-tools All llvm tools that do not have corresponding tag missing-feature Feature requests? Is this different from [enhancement]?

Comments

@lattner
Copy link
Collaborator

lattner commented Aug 6, 2006

Bugzilla Link 869
Resolution FIXED
Resolved on Feb 22, 2010 12:47
Version 1.5
OS All
Blocks #870

Extended Description

Tracking bug, this prevents llvm-gcc4 from fully replacing llvm-gcc3.

@lattner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lattner commented Jan 18, 2007

liblto implements this. Chandler's recent work on binutils makes this available on GNU platforms.

@llvmbot llvmbot transferred this issue from llvm/llvm-bugzilla-archive Dec 3, 2021
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla llvm-tools All llvm tools that do not have corresponding tag missing-feature Feature requests? Is this different from [enhancement]?
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant