-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.8k
Closed
Labels
backend:X86bugzillaIssues migrated from bugzillaIssues migrated from bugzillawontfixIssue is real, but we can't or won't fix it. Not invalidIssue is real, but we can't or won't fix it. Not invalid
Description
| Bugzilla Link | 566 |
| Resolution | WONTFIX |
| Resolved on | Mar 06, 2010 14:00 |
| Version | 1.5 |
| OS | Linux |
| Reporter | LLVM Bugzilla Contributor |
Extended Description
According to the design in the language reference manual, the LLVM readio and
writeio intrinsics should strongly order I/O memory accesses.
However, the current implementation lowers these intrinsics to volatile loads
and stores on ix86. These loads and stores may or may not be properly ordered,
depending on the processor on which they run.
The correct solution is not obvious. Certain fencing instructions are not found
on older Pentium processors, and we will need a general fencing model for SMP
systems anyway. Such a design has not been discussed, though, as far as I know.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
backend:X86bugzillaIssues migrated from bugzillaIssues migrated from bugzillawontfixIssue is real, but we can't or won't fix it. Not invalidIssue is real, but we can't or won't fix it. Not invalid