diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
index f33e04e804e3d..75a59c9553e18 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
@@ -3308,6 +3308,300 @@ void DependenceInfo::updateDirection(Dependence::DVEntry &Level,
     llvm_unreachable("constraint has unexpected kind");
 }
 
+namespace {
+
+/// The type of signed monotonicity of a SCEV expression. This property is
+/// defined with respect to the outermost loop that DA is analyzing. Invariant
+/// and MultiMonotonic mutually exclusive, and both imply NoSignedWrap.
+///
+/// This is designed to classify the behavior of AddRec expressions, and does
+/// not care about other SCEVs. For example, given the two loop invariants `A`
+/// and `B`, `A + B` is treated as Invariant even if the addition may wrap. On
+/// the other hand, if either `A` or `B` is an AddRec and we cannot prove the
+/// addition doesn't wrap, the result is classified as Unknown.
+enum class MonotonicityType {
+  Unknown, ///< The expression contains some non loop-invariant SCEVUnknown or
+           ///< arithmetic operation that has some AddRec as its subexpression
+           ///< and may cause signed wrap.
+  NoSignedWrap, ///< The expression doesn't contain any AddRecs that may wrap.
+                ///< This is a weaker property than Invariant or MultiMonotonic.
+                ///< Invariant and MultiMonotonic imply NoSignedWrap.
+  Invariant,    ///< The expression is a loop-invariant.
+  MultiMonotonic, ///< The expression is monotonically increasing or decreasing
+                  ///< with respect to each loop. This is exclusive of
+                  ///< Invariant. That is, we say an SCEV is MultiMonotonic only
+                  ///< if it contains at least one AddRec where its step
+                  ///< reccurence value is non-zero. Monotonicity is checked
+                  ///< independently for each loop. It is allowed to contain
+                  ///< both increasing and decreasing AddRecs.
+};
+
+/// A visitor that checks the signed monotonicity of SCEVs.
+struct SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker
+    : public SCEVVisitor<SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker, MonotonicityType> {
+
+  /// \p Ptr is the pointer that the SCEV is associated with, if any. It may be
+  /// used for the inferrence.
+  static MonotonicityType checkMonotonicity(ScalarEvolution *SE,
+                                            const SCEV *Expr,
+                                            const Loop *OutermostLoop,
+                                            const Value *Ptr = nullptr);
+
+  MonotonicityType visitAddRecExpr(const SCEVAddRecExpr *Expr);
+  MonotonicityType visitUnknown(const SCEVUnknown *Expr);
+  MonotonicityType visitZeroExtendExpr(const SCEVZeroExtendExpr *Expr);
+  MonotonicityType visitSignExtendExpr(const SCEVSignExtendExpr *Expr);
+
+  MonotonicityType visitAddExpr(const SCEVAddExpr *Expr) {
+    return visitNAryHelper(Expr);
+  }
+  MonotonicityType visitMulExpr(const SCEVMulExpr *Expr) {
+    return visitNAryHelper(Expr);
+  }
+
+  MonotonicityType visitConstant(const SCEVConstant *) {
+    return MonotonicityType::Invariant;
+  }
+  MonotonicityType visitVScale(const SCEVVScale *) {
+    return MonotonicityType::Invariant;
+  }
+
+  // TODO: Handle more cases.
+  MonotonicityType visitPtrToIntExpr(const SCEVPtrToIntExpr *Expr) {
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+  }
+  MonotonicityType visitTruncateExpr(const SCEVTruncateExpr *Expr) {
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+  }
+  MonotonicityType visitUDivExpr(const SCEVUDivExpr *Expr) {
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+  }
+  MonotonicityType visitSMaxExpr(const SCEVSMaxExpr *Expr) {
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+  }
+  MonotonicityType visitUMaxExpr(const SCEVUMaxExpr *Expr) {
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+  }
+  MonotonicityType visitSMinExpr(const SCEVSMinExpr *Expr) {
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+  }
+  MonotonicityType visitUMinExpr(const SCEVUMinExpr *Expr) {
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+  }
+  MonotonicityType visitSequentialUMinExpr(const SCEVSequentialUMinExpr *Expr) {
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+  }
+  MonotonicityType visitCouldNotCompute(const SCEVCouldNotCompute *Expr) {
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+  }
+
+private:
+  ScalarEvolution *SE;
+  const Loop *OutermostLoop;
+  bool NoWrapFromGEP = false;
+
+  SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker(ScalarEvolution *SE, const Loop *OutermostLoop,
+                                const Value *Ptr);
+
+  MonotonicityType visitNAryHelper(const SCEVNAryExpr *Expr);
+  MonotonicityType unknownMonotonicity(const SCEV *Expr);
+  bool isLoopInvariant(const SCEV *Expr) const;
+};
+
+} // anonymous namespace
+
+SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker(
+    ScalarEvolution *SE, const Loop *OutermostLoop, const Value *Ptr)
+    : SE(SE), OutermostLoop(OutermostLoop) {
+  if (Ptr) {
+    // Perform reasoning similar to LoopAccessAnalysis. If an AddRec would wrap
+    // and the GEP would have nusw, the wrapped memory location would become
+    // like as follows (in the mathmatical sense, assuming the step recurrence
+    // is positive):
+    //
+    //   (previously accessed location) + (step recurrence) - 2^N
+    //
+    // where N is the size of the pointer index type. Since the value of step
+    // recurrence is less than 2^(N-1), the distance between the previously
+    // accessed location and the wrapped location will be greater than 2^(N-1),
+    // which is larger than half the pointer index type space. The size of
+    // allocated object must not exceed the largest signed integer that fits
+    // into the index type, so the GEP value would be poison and any memory
+    // access using it would be immediate UB when executed.
+    //
+    // TODO: We don't check if the result of the GEP is always used. Maybe we
+    // should check the reachability from the GEP to the target instruction.
+    // E.g., in the following case, no-wrap would not trigger immediate UB:
+    //
+    //  entry:
+    //    ...
+    //    %gep = getelementptr inbounds i32, ptr %ptr, i32 %addrec
+    //    br i1 %cond, label %store, label %sink
+    //
+    //   store:
+    //     store i32 42, ptr %ptr
+    //     br label %sink
+    //
+    //   sink:
+    //     ...
+    //
+    auto *GEP = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(Ptr);
+    if (GEP && GEP->hasNoUnsignedSignedWrap())
+      NoWrapFromGEP = true;
+  }
+}
+
+MonotonicityType SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::checkMonotonicity(
+    ScalarEvolution *SE, const SCEV *Expr, const Loop *OutermostLoop,
+    const Value *Ptr) {
+  SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker Checker(SE, OutermostLoop, Ptr);
+  MonotonicityType MT = Checker.visit(Expr);
+
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+  switch (MT) {
+  case MonotonicityType::Unknown:
+    LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Monotonicity: Unknown expr: " << *Expr << "\n");
+    break;
+  case MonotonicityType::NoSignedWrap:
+    LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Monotonicity: No signed wrap expr: " << *Expr
+                      << "\n");
+    break;
+  case MonotonicityType::Invariant:
+    LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Monotonicity: Invariant expr: " << *Expr << "\n");
+    break;
+  case MonotonicityType::MultiMonotonic:
+    LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Monotonicity: Monotonic expr: " << *Expr << "\n");
+    break;
+  }
+#endif
+  return MT;
+}
+
+MonotonicityType
+SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::visitNAryHelper(const SCEVNAryExpr *Expr) {
+  assert((isa<SCEVAddExpr>(Expr) || isa<SCEVMulExpr>(Expr)) &&
+         "Unexpected SCEV");
+
+  if (isLoopInvariant(Expr))
+    return MonotonicityType::Invariant;
+
+  MonotonicityType Result = MonotonicityType::Invariant;
+  for (const SCEV *Op : Expr->operands()) {
+    assert(Result != MonotonicityType::Unknown && "Unexpected state");
+    switch (visit(Op)) {
+    case MonotonicityType::Unknown:
+      return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+    case MonotonicityType::NoSignedWrap:
+      Result = MonotonicityType::NoSignedWrap;
+      break;
+    case MonotonicityType::Invariant:
+      break;
+    case MonotonicityType::MultiMonotonic: {
+      switch (Result) {
+      case MonotonicityType::Unknown:
+        llvm_unreachable("should have been handled above");
+      case MonotonicityType::NoSignedWrap:
+        break;
+      case MonotonicityType::Invariant:
+        if (!Expr->hasNoSignedWrap())
+          return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+        Result = MonotonicityType::MultiMonotonic;
+        break;
+      case MonotonicityType::MultiMonotonic:
+        if (!Expr->hasNoSignedWrap())
+          return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+        if (!isa<SCEVAddExpr>(Expr))
+          return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+        // Monotonic + Monotonic might be a loop invariant, e.g., the following
+        // SCEV:
+        //
+        //   {0,+,1}<%loop> + {0,+,-1}<%loop>
+        //
+        // In that case, relax the property to NoSignedWrap.
+        Result = MonotonicityType::NoSignedWrap;
+        break;
+      }
+    } break;
+    }
+  }
+  return Result;
+}
+
+MonotonicityType
+SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::unknownMonotonicity(const SCEV *Expr) {
+  LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Failed to prove monotonicity for: " << *Expr << "\n");
+  return MonotonicityType::Unknown;
+}
+
+bool SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::isLoopInvariant(const SCEV *Expr) const {
+  return !OutermostLoop || SE->isLoopInvariant(Expr, OutermostLoop);
+}
+
+MonotonicityType
+SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::visitAddRecExpr(const SCEVAddRecExpr *Expr) {
+  if (!Expr->isAffine())
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+
+  const SCEV *Start = Expr->getStart();
+  const SCEV *Step = Expr->getStepRecurrence(*SE);
+
+  MonotonicityType StartRes = visit(Start);
+  if (StartRes == MonotonicityType::Unknown)
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+
+  MonotonicityType StepRes = visit(Step);
+  if (StepRes != MonotonicityType::Invariant)
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+
+  // TODO: Enhance the inference here.
+  if (!Expr->hasNoSignedWrap() && !NoWrapFromGEP) {
+    if (!SE->isKnownNegative(Step))
+      // If the coefficient can be positive value, ensure that the AddRec is
+      // monotonically increasing.
+      if (!SE->isKnownOnEveryIteration(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, Expr, Start))
+        return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+
+    if (!SE->isKnownPositive(Step))
+      // If the coefficient can be positive value, ensure that the AddRec is
+      // monotonically decreasing.
+      if (!SE->isKnownOnEveryIteration(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE, Expr, Start))
+        return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+  }
+
+  bool IsKnownNonZero = SE->isKnownNonZero(Step);
+  switch (StartRes) {
+  case MonotonicityType::Unknown:
+    llvm_unreachable("should have been handled above");
+  case MonotonicityType::NoSignedWrap:
+    return MonotonicityType::NoSignedWrap;
+  case MonotonicityType::Invariant:
+    return IsKnownNonZero ? MonotonicityType::MultiMonotonic
+                          : MonotonicityType::NoSignedWrap;
+  case MonotonicityType::MultiMonotonic:
+    // TODO: Should handle SCEV like `{{0,+,-1}<%loop>,+,1}<%loop>`?
+    return IsKnownNonZero ? MonotonicityType::MultiMonotonic
+                          : MonotonicityType::NoSignedWrap;
+  }
+  llvm_unreachable("unhandled MonotonicityType");
+}
+
+MonotonicityType SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::visitZeroExtendExpr(
+    const SCEVZeroExtendExpr *Expr) {
+  return visit(Expr->getOperand());
+}
+
+MonotonicityType SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::visitSignExtendExpr(
+    const SCEVSignExtendExpr *Expr) {
+  return visit(Expr->getOperand());
+}
+
+MonotonicityType
+SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::visitUnknown(const SCEVUnknown *Expr) {
+  if (!isLoopInvariant(Expr))
+    return unknownMonotonicity(Expr);
+  return MonotonicityType::Invariant;
+}
+
 /// Check if we can delinearize the subscripts. If the SCEVs representing the
 /// source and destination array references are recurrences on a nested loop,
 /// this function flattens the nested recurrences into separate recurrences
@@ -3500,12 +3794,37 @@ bool DependenceInfo::tryDelinearizeParametricSize(
   // to the dependency checks.
   if (!DisableDelinearizationChecks)
     for (size_t I = 1; I < Size; ++I) {
+      const Loop *OutermostLoop =
+          LI->getLoopFor(Src->getParent())->getOutermostLoop();
+
+      // TODO: In general, reasoning about monotonicity of a subscript from the
+      // base pointer would lead incorrect result. Probably we need to check
+      // the loops associated with this subscript are disjoint from those
+      // associated with the other subscripts. The validation would be
+      // something like:
+      //
+      //   LoopsI = collectCommonLoops(SrcSubscripts[I])
+      //   LoopsOthers = collectCommonLoops(SrcSCEV - SrcSubscripts[I])
+      //   CanUsePtr = (LoopsI intersect LoopsOthers) is empty.
+      //
+      MonotonicityType SrcMonotonicity =
+          SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::checkMonotonicity(
+              SE, SrcSubscripts[I], OutermostLoop, SrcPtr);
+      if (SrcMonotonicity == MonotonicityType::Unknown)
+        return false;
+
       if (!isKnownNonNegative(SrcSubscripts[I], SrcPtr))
         return false;
 
       if (!isKnownLessThan(SrcSubscripts[I], Sizes[I - 1]))
         return false;
 
+      MonotonicityType DstMonotonicity =
+          SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::checkMonotonicity(
+              SE, DstSubscripts[I], OutermostLoop, DstPtr);
+      if (DstMonotonicity == MonotonicityType::Unknown)
+        return false;
+
       if (!isKnownNonNegative(DstSubscripts[I], DstPtr))
         return false;
 
@@ -3679,11 +3998,23 @@ DependenceInfo::depends(Instruction *Src, Instruction *Dst,
   Pair[0].Src = SrcSCEV;
   Pair[0].Dst = DstSCEV;
 
+  const Loop *OutermostLoop = SrcLoop ? SrcLoop->getOutermostLoop() : nullptr;
+  if (SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::checkMonotonicity(
+          SE, SrcEv, OutermostLoop, SrcPtr) == MonotonicityType::Unknown)
+    return std::make_unique<Dependence>(Src, Dst,
+                                        SCEVUnionPredicate(Assume, *SE));
+  if (SCEVSignedMonotonicityChecker::checkMonotonicity(
+          SE, DstEv, OutermostLoop, DstPtr) == MonotonicityType::Unknown)
+    return std::make_unique<Dependence>(Src, Dst,
+                                        SCEVUnionPredicate(Assume, *SE));
+
   if (Delinearize) {
     if (tryDelinearize(Src, Dst, Pair)) {
       LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "    delinearized\n");
       Pairs = Pair.size();
     }
+    // TODO: Check that the original offsets are monotonic when delinearization
+    // fails.
   }
 
   for (unsigned P = 0; P < Pairs; ++P) {
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Banerjee.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Banerjee.ll
index e0def901d1759..c96f0dfa1f5d5 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Banerjee.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Banerjee.ll
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ define void @banerjee0(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx6, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 ; NORMALIZE-LABEL: 'banerjee0'
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ define void @banerjee0(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx6, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 ; DELIN-LABEL: 'banerjee0'
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ define void @banerjee0(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx6, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ define void @banerjee9(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %1 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx7, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 ; NORMALIZE-LABEL: 'banerjee9'
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ define void @banerjee9(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: %1 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx7, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 ; DELIN-LABEL: 'banerjee9'
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ define void @banerjee9(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: %1 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx7, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ define void @banerjee10(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %1 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx6, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 ; NORMALIZE-LABEL: 'banerjee10'
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ define void @banerjee10(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: %1 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx6, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 ; DELIN-LABEL: 'banerjee10'
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8
@@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ define void @banerjee10(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: %1 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx6, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ define void @banerjee11(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx6, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 ; NORMALIZE-LABEL: 'banerjee11'
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8
@@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ define void @banerjee11(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx6, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 ; DELIN-LABEL: 'banerjee11'
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8
@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ define void @banerjee11(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx6, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ define void @banerjee12(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx6, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 ; NORMALIZE-LABEL: 'banerjee12'
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8
@@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ define void @banerjee12(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx6, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; NORMALIZE-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; NORMALIZE-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 ; DELIN-LABEL: 'banerjee12'
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 0, ptr %arrayidx, align 8
@@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ define void @banerjee12(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %m, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i64, ptr %arrayidx6, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
 ; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; DELIN-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8 --> Dst: store i64 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 8
-; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; DELIN-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/BasePtrBug.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/BasePtrBug.ll
index 81e461a5e092d..f51f1fa59f544 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/BasePtrBug.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/BasePtrBug.ll
@@ -18,11 +18,11 @@ define void @test1(ptr nocapture %A, ptr nocapture %B, i32 %N) #0 {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %gep.0, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %gep.0, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %gep.0, align 4 --> Dst: %1 = load i32, ptr %gep.1, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - input [*|<]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %gep.0, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %add, ptr %gep.B, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %1 = load i32, ptr %gep.1, align 4 --> Dst: %1 = load i32, ptr %gep.1, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %1 = load i32, ptr %gep.1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %add, ptr %gep.B, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %add, ptr %gep.B, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %add, ptr %gep.B, align 4
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/DADelin.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/DADelin.ll
index 8f94a455d3724..174f105b666f3 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/DADelin.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/DADelin.ll
@@ -646,11 +646,11 @@ exit:
 define void @coeff_may_negative(ptr %a, i32 %k) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: 'coeff_may_negative'
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i8 42, ptr %idx.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 42, ptr %idx.0, align 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i8 42, ptr %idx.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 42, ptr %idx.1, align 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - output [*|<]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i8 42, ptr %idx.1, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 42, ptr %idx.1, align 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %loop
@@ -685,11 +685,11 @@ exit:
 define void @coeff_positive(ptr %a, i32 %k) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: 'coeff_positive'
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i8 42, ptr %idx.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 42, ptr %idx.0, align 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i8 42, ptr %idx.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 42, ptr %idx.1, align 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - output [*|<]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i8 42, ptr %idx.1, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 42, ptr %idx.1, align 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %loop
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactRDIV.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactRDIV.ll
index b5ece14121686..73c0c8b47d74f 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactRDIV.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactRDIV.ll
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ define void @rdiv9(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx4, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ define void @rdiv10(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx4, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ define void @rdiv11(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx4, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ define void @rdiv12(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx4, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/GCD.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/GCD.ll
index 03343e7a98211..93a2f07e7df21 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/GCD.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/GCD.ll
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ define void @gcd0(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx7, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ define void @gcd1(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx8, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ define void @gcd2(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx8, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ define void @gcd3(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ define void @gcd4(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %M, i64 %N) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx16, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ define void @gcd5(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %M, i64 %N) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx16, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -465,13 +465,13 @@ for.end12:                                        ; preds = %for.end12.loopexit,
 define void @gcd7(i32 %n, ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: 'gcd7'
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %7, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %7, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - output [* *]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %7, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4 --> Dst: %11 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx12, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - flow [* *|<]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %7, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %11, ptr %B.addr.12, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %11 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx12, align 4 --> Dst: %11 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx12, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - input [* *]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %11 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx12, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %11, ptr %B.addr.12, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %11, ptr %B.addr.12, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %11, ptr %B.addr.12, align 4
@@ -640,13 +640,13 @@ for.end15:                                        ; preds = %for.end15.loopexit,
 define void @gcd9(i32 %n, ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: 'gcd9'
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %7, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %7, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - output [* *]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %7, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4 --> Dst: %11 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx12, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - flow [* *|<]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %7, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %11, ptr %B.addr.12, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %11 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx12, align 4 --> Dst: %11 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx12, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - input [* *]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %11 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx12, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %11, ptr %B.addr.12, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %11, ptr %B.addr.12, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %11, ptr %B.addr.12, align 4
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/PR21585.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/PR21585.ll
index 0d59e107b9c35..c234c59db9f17 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/PR21585.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/PR21585.ll
@@ -70,11 +70,11 @@ for.end:
 define void @i16_wrap(ptr %a) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: 'i16_wrap'
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i64, ptr %idx, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i64, ptr %idx, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - input [*]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i64, ptr %idx, align 4 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %idx, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - anti [*|<]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i64 %1, ptr %idx, align 4 --> Dst: store i64 %1, ptr %idx, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - output [*]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.body
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Preliminary.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Preliminary.ll
index 8cb0e2ac770dc..e7449c6072846 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Preliminary.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Preliminary.ll
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ define void @p4(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx5, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp sgt i64 %n, 0
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ define void @p5(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx5, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp sgt i64 %n, 0
@@ -729,9 +729,9 @@ define void @foo(ptr %s, i32 %size) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %1 = load i32, ptr %0, align 4 --> Dst: %1 = load i32, ptr %0, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %1 = load i32, ptr %0, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %1, ptr %i.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - consistent anti [1]!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %1, ptr %i.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %1, ptr %i.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %idx.ext = zext i32 %size to i64
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Propagating.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Propagating.ll
index 866f515baeafb..2cd393730096d 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Propagating.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Propagating.ll
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ define void @prop0(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx8, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ define void @prop1(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx14, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.21, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.21, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.21, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ define void @prop2(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx7, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ define void @prop3(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx8, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ define void @prop4(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx10, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ define void @prop5(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx12, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ define void @prop6(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ define void @prop7(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx13, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ define void @prop8(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx9, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ define void @prop9(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx9, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.11, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Separability.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Separability.ll
index 2ed9cca4d1fc0..3e886e65c5ab1 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Separability.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Separability.ll
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ define void @sep0(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx15, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.31, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.31, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.31, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ define void @sep1(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx15, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.31, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.31, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.31, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ define void @sep2(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx19, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.31, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.31, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.31, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ define void @sep3(ptr %A, ptr %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx20, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.31, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.31, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.31, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   br label %for.cond1.preheader
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/StrongSIV.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/StrongSIV.ll
index 44bd9b7727910..d6bd30ed9050f 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/StrongSIV.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/StrongSIV.ll
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ define void @strong2(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ define void @strong9(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SymbolicRDIV.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SymbolicRDIV.ll
index 8b9aa257a7c57..ba4f2101df77e 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SymbolicRDIV.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SymbolicRDIV.ll
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ define void @symbolicrdiv0(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n1, i64 %n2) nounwind uwtable ss
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx8, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp4 = icmp eq i64 %n1, 0
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ define void @symbolicrdiv1(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n1, i64 %n2) nounwind uwtable ss
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx9, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp4 = icmp eq i64 %n1, 0
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ define void @symbolicrdiv2(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n1, i64 %n2) nounwind uwtable ss
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx7, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp4 = icmp eq i64 %n1, 0
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ define void @symbolicrdiv3(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n1, i64 %n2) nounwind uwtable ss
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp4 = icmp eq i64 %n1, 0
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ define void @symbolicrdiv4(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n1, i64 %n2) nounwind uwtable ss
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx7, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp4 = icmp eq i64 %n1, 0
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ define void @symbolicrdiv5(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n1, i64 %n2) nounwind uwtable ss
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx7, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp4 = icmp eq i64 %n1, 0
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SymbolicSIV.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SymbolicSIV.ll
index cdfaec76fa892..b2b021cf41681 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SymbolicSIV.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SymbolicSIV.ll
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ define void @symbolicsiv0(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx4, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ define void @symbolicsiv1(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx5, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ define void @symbolicsiv2(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx3, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ define void @symbolicsiv3(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx3, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ define void @symbolicsiv4(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx3, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ define void @symbolicsiv5(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx4, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ define void @weaktest(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ define void @symbolicsiv6(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n, i64 %N, i64 %M) nounwind uwtab
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx7, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ define void @symbolicsiv7(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n, i64 %N, i64 %M) nounwind uwtab
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %1 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx6, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %1, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %1, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %1, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/WeakCrossingSIV.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/WeakCrossingSIV.ll
index cd044032e34f1..4884a34217a86 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/WeakCrossingSIV.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/WeakCrossingSIV.ll
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ define void @weakcrossing0(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ define void @weakcrossing1(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ define void @weakcrossing5(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %1 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %1, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %1, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %1, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/WeakZeroDstSIV.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/WeakZeroDstSIV.ll
index 71a5ed62b8e21..3c7ab6075964b 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/WeakZeroDstSIV.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/WeakZeroDstSIV.ll
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ define void @weakzerodst1(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ define void @weakzerodst6(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/WeakZeroSrcSIV.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/WeakZeroSrcSIV.ll
index 2ee1a37775f46..31fae73f0b652 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/WeakZeroSrcSIV.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/WeakZeroSrcSIV.ll
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ define void @weakzerosrc1(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ define void @weakzerosrc6(ptr %A, ptr %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.02, align 4
-; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
 ;
 entry:
   %cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/monotonic.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/monotonic.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..4d80772e5ed24
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/monotonic.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
+; REQUIRES: asserts
+; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output -passes="print<da>" -debug-only=da 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
+;   a[i] = 0;
+;
+define void @single_loop_nsw(ptr %a, i64 %n) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'single_loop_nsw'
+; CHECK: Monotonicity: Monotonic expr: {0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop>
+;
+entry:
+  %guard = icmp sgt i64 %n, 0
+  br i1 %guard, label %loop, label %exit
+
+loop:
+  %i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop ]
+  %idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %a, i64 %i
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %i.inc = add nsw i64 %i, 1
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %i.inc, %n
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+; The purpose of the variable `begin` is to avoid violating the size limitation
+; of the allocated object in LLVM IR, which would cause UB.
+;
+; for (unsigned long long i = begin; i < end; i++)
+;   a[i] = 0;
+;
+define void @single_loop_nuw(ptr %a, i64 %begin, i64 %end) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'single_loop_nuw'
+; CHECK: Failed to prove monotonicity for: {%begin,+,1}<nuw><%loop>
+; CHECK: Monotonicity: Unknown expr: {%begin,+,1}<nuw><%loop>
+;
+entry:
+  %guard = icmp ult i64 %begin, %end
+  br i1 %guard, label %loop, label %exit
+
+loop:
+  %i = phi i64 [ %begin, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop ]
+  %idx = getelementptr i8, ptr %a, i64 %i
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %i.inc = add nuw i64 %i, 1
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %i.inc, %end
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
+;   for (int j = 0; j < m; j++)
+;     a[i + j] = 0;
+;
+define void @nested_loop_nsw0(ptr %a, i64 %n, i64 %m) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'nested_loop_nsw0'
+; CHECK: Monotonicity: Monotonic expr: {{\{}}{0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop.i.header>,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop.j>
+;
+entry:
+  %guard.i = icmp sgt i64 %n, 0
+  br i1 %guard.i, label %loop.i.header, label %exit
+
+loop.i.header:
+  %i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop.i.latch ]
+  br label %loop.j.preheader
+
+loop.j.preheader:
+  %gurard.j = icmp sgt i64 %m, 0
+  br i1 %gurard.j, label %loop.j, label %loop.i.latch
+
+loop.j:
+  %j = phi i64 [ 0, %loop.j.preheader ], [ %j.inc, %loop.j ]
+  %offset = add nsw i64 %i, %j
+  %idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %a, i64 %offset
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %j.inc = add nsw i64 %j, 1
+  %exitcond.j = icmp eq i64 %j.inc, %m
+  br i1 %exitcond.j, label %loop.i.latch, label %loop.j
+
+loop.i.latch:
+  %i.inc = add nsw i64 %i, 1
+  %exitcond.i = icmp eq i64 %i.inc, %n
+  br i1 %exitcond.i, label %exit, label %loop.i.header
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+; for (int i = n - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+;   for (int j = 0; j < m; j++)
+;     a[i + j] = 0;
+;
+define void @nested_loop_nsw1(ptr %a, i64 %n, i64 %m) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'nested_loop_nsw1'
+; CHECK: Monotonicity: Monotonic expr: {{\{}}{(-1 + %n),+,-1}<nsw><%loop.i.header>,+,1}<nsw><%loop.j>
+;
+entry:
+  %guard.i = icmp sgt i64 %n, 0
+  br i1 %guard.i, label %loop.i.header, label %exit
+
+loop.i.header:
+  %i = phi i64 [ %n, %entry ], [ %i.dec, %loop.i.latch ]
+  %i.dec = add nsw i64 %i, -1
+  br label %loop.j.preheader
+
+loop.j.preheader:
+  %gurard.j = icmp sgt i64 %m, 0
+  br i1 %gurard.j, label %loop.j, label %loop.i.latch
+
+loop.j:
+  %j = phi i64 [ 0, %loop.j.preheader ], [ %j.inc, %loop.j ]
+  %offset = add nsw i64 %i.dec, %j
+  %idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %a, i64 %offset
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %j.inc = add nsw i64 %j, 1
+  %exitcond.j = icmp eq i64 %j.inc, %m
+  br i1 %exitcond.j, label %loop.i.latch, label %loop.j
+
+loop.i.latch:
+  %exitcond.i = icmp eq i64 %i.dec, 0
+  br i1 %exitcond.i, label %exit, label %loop.i.header
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+; for (int i = begin0; i < end0; i++)
+;   for (int j = begin1; j < end1; j++) {
+;     unsigned long long offset = (unsigned long long)i + (unsigned long long)j;
+;     a[offset] = 0;
+;   }
+;
+define void @nested_loop_nuw(ptr %a, i64 %begin0, i64 %end0, i64 %begin1, i64 %end1) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'nested_loop_nuw'
+; CHECK: Failed to prove monotonicity for: {{\{}}{(%begin0 + %begin1),+,1}<nw><%loop.i.header>,+,1}<nw><%loop.j>
+; CHECK: Monotonicity: Unknown expr: {{\{}}{(%begin0 + %begin1),+,1}<nw><%loop.i.header>,+,1}<nw><%loop.j>
+;
+entry:
+  %guard.i.0 = icmp slt i64 0, %begin0
+  %guard.i.1 = icmp slt i64 %begin0, %end0
+  %guard.i.2 = icmp slt i64 0, %end0
+  %and.i.0 = and i1 %guard.i.0, %guard.i.1
+  %and.i.1 = and i1 %and.i.0, %guard.i.2
+  br i1 %and.i.1, label %loop.i.header, label %exit
+
+loop.i.header:
+  %i = phi i64 [ %begin0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop.i.latch ]
+  br label %loop.j.preheader
+
+loop.j.preheader:
+  %guard.j.0 = icmp slt i64 0, %begin1
+  %guard.j.1 = icmp slt i64 %begin1, %end1
+  %guard.j.2 = icmp slt i64 0, %end1
+  %and.j.0 = and i1 %guard.j.0, %guard.j.1
+  %and.j.1 = and i1 %and.j.0, %guard.j.2
+  br i1 %and.j.1, label %loop.j, label %loop.i.latch
+
+loop.j:
+  %j = phi i64 [ %begin1, %loop.j.preheader ], [ %j.inc, %loop.j ]
+  %offset = add nuw i64 %i, %j
+  %idx = getelementptr i8, ptr %a, i64 %offset
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %j.inc = add nsw i64 %j, 1
+  %exitcond.j = icmp eq i64 %j.inc, %end1
+  br i1 %exitcond.j, label %loop.i.latch, label %loop.j
+
+loop.i.latch:
+  %i.inc = add nsw i64 %i, 1
+  %exitcond.i = icmp eq i64 %i.inc, %end0
+  br i1 %exitcond.i, label %exit, label %loop.i.header
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+; `step` can be zero, so `step*j` can be either Invariant or Monotonic. This
+; propagates to `i + step*j`.
+;
+; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
+;   for (int j = 0; j < m; j++)
+;     a[i + step*j] = 0;
+;
+define void @nested_loop_step(ptr %a, i64 %n, i64 %m, i64 %step) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'nested_loop_step'
+; CHECK: Monotonicity: No signed wrap expr: {{\{}}{0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop.i.header>,+,%step}<nsw><%loop.j>
+;
+entry:
+  %guard.i = icmp sgt i64 %n, 0
+  br i1 %guard.i, label %loop.i.header, label %exit
+
+loop.i.header:
+  %i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop.i.latch ]
+  br label %loop.j.preheader
+
+loop.j.preheader:
+  %gurard.j = icmp sgt i64 %m, 0
+  br i1 %gurard.j, label %loop.j, label %loop.i.latch
+
+loop.j:
+  %j = phi i64 [ 0, %loop.j.preheader ], [ %j.inc, %loop.j ]
+  %offset.j = phi i64 [ 0, %loop.j.preheader ], [ %offset.j.next, %loop.j ]
+  %offset = add nsw i64 %i, %offset.j
+  %idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %a, i64 %offset
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %j.inc = add nsw i64 %j, 1
+  %offset.j.next = add nsw i64 %offset.j, %step
+  %exitcond.j = icmp eq i64 %j.inc, %m
+  br i1 %exitcond.j, label %loop.i.latch, label %loop.j
+
+loop.i.latch:
+  %i.inc = add nsw i64 %i, 1
+  %exitcond.i = icmp eq i64 %i.inc, %n
+  br i1 %exitcond.i, label %exit, label %loop.i.header
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+; `offset` can be loop-invariant since `step` can be zero.
+;
+; int8_t offset = start;
+; for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++, offset += step)
+;   a[sext(offset)] = 0;
+;
+define void @sext_nsw(ptr %a, i8 %start, i8 %step) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'sext_nsw'
+; CHECK: Monotonicity: No signed wrap expr: {(sext i8 %start to i64),+,(sext i8 %step to i64)}<nsw><%loop>
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop
+
+loop:
+  %i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop ]
+  %offset = phi i8 [ %start, %entry ], [ %offset.next, %loop ]
+  %offset.sext = sext i8 %offset to i64
+  %idx = getelementptr i8, ptr %a, i64 %offset.sext
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %i.inc = add nsw i64 %i, 1
+  %offset.next = add nsw i8 %offset, %step
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %i.inc, 100
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+; The addition for `%offset.next` can wrap, so we cannot prove monotonicity.
+;
+; int8_t offset = start;
+; for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++, offset += step)
+;   a[sext(offset)] = 0;
+;
+define void @sext_may_wrap(ptr %a, i8 %start, i8 %step) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'sext_may_wrap'
+; CHECK: Failed to prove monotonicity for: {%start,+,%step}<%loop>
+; CHECK: Monotonicity: Unknown expr: (sext i8 {%start,+,%step}<%loop> to i64)
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop
+
+loop:
+  %i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop ]
+  %offset = phi i8 [ %start, %entry ], [ %offset.next, %loop ]
+  %offset.sext = sext i8 %offset to i64
+  %idx = getelementptr i8, ptr %a, i64 %offset.sext
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %i.inc = add nsw i64 %i, 1
+  %offset.next = add i8 %offset, %step
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %i.inc, 100
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+; `offset` can be loop-invariant since `step` can be zero.
+;
+; int8_t offset = start;
+; for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++, offset += step)
+;   a[zext(offset)] = 0;
+;
+define void @zext_nsw(ptr %a, i8 %start, i8 %step) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'zext_nsw'
+; CHECK: Monotonicity: No signed wrap expr: (zext i8 {%start,+,%step}<nsw><%loop> to i64)
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop
+
+loop:
+  %i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop ]
+  %offset = phi i8 [ %start, %entry ], [ %offset.next, %loop ]
+  %offset.zext = zext i8 %offset to i64
+  %idx = getelementptr i8, ptr %a, i64 %offset.zext
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %i.inc = add nsw i64 %i, 1
+  %offset.next = add nsw i8 %offset, %step
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %i.inc, 100
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+; The addition for `%offset.next` can wrap, so we cannot prove monotonicity.
+;
+; int8_t offset = start;
+; for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++, offset += step)
+;   a[zext(offset)] = 0;
+;
+define void @zext_may_wrap(ptr %a, i8 %start, i8 %step) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'zext_may_wrap'
+; CHECK: Failed to prove monotonicity for: {%start,+,%step}<%loop>
+; CHECK: Monotonicity: Unknown expr: (zext i8 {%start,+,%step}<%loop> to i64)
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop
+
+loop:
+  %i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop ]
+  %offset = phi i8 [ %start, %entry ], [ %offset.next, %loop ]
+  %offset.zext = zext i8 %offset to i64
+  %idx = getelementptr i8, ptr %a, i64 %offset.zext
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %i.inc = add nsw i64 %i, 1
+  %offset.next = add i8 %offset, %step
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %i.inc, 100
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+; The value of step reccurence is not invariant with respect to the outer most
+; loop (the i-loop).
+;
+; offset_i = 0;
+; for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
+;   for (int j = 0; j < 100; j++)
+;     a[offset_i + j] = 0;
+;   offset_i += (i % 2 == 0) ? 0 : 3;
+; }
+;
+define void @step_is_variant(ptr %a) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'step_is_variant'
+; CHECK: Failed to prove monotonicity for: %offset.i
+; CHECK: Failed to prove monotonicity for: {%offset.i,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop.j>
+; CHECK: Monotonicity: Unknown expr: {%offset.i,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop.j>
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop.i.header
+
+loop.i.header:
+  %i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop.i.latch ]
+  %offset.i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %offset.i.next, %loop.i.latch ]
+  %step.i.0 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %step.i.1, %loop.i.latch ]
+  %step.i.1 = phi i64 [ 3, %entry ], [ %step.i.0, %loop.i.latch ]
+  br label %loop.j
+
+loop.j:
+  %j = phi i64 [ 0, %loop.i.header ], [ %j.inc, %loop.j ]
+  %offset = add nsw i64 %offset.i, %j
+  %idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %a, i64 %offset
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %j.inc = add nsw i64 %j, 1
+  %exitcond.j = icmp eq i64 %j.inc, 100
+  br i1 %exitcond.j, label %loop.i.latch, label %loop.j
+
+loop.i.latch:
+  %i.inc = add nsw i64 %i, 1
+  %offset.i.next = add nsw i64 %offset.i, %step.i.0
+  %exitcond.i = icmp eq i64 %i.inc, 100
+  br i1 %exitcond.i, label %exit, label %loop.i.header
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}