-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[analyzer] Use explicit call description mode in iterator checkers #88913
[analyzer] Use explicit call description mode in iterator checkers #88913
Conversation
This commit explicitly specifies the matching mode (C library function, any non-method function, or C++ method) for the `CallDescription`s constructed in the iterator/container checkers. This change won't cause major functional changes, but isn't NFC because it ensures that e.g. call descriptions for a non-method function won't accidentally match a method that has the same name. Separate commits will perform (or have already performed) this change in other checkers. My goal is to ensure that the call description mode is always explicitly specified and eliminate (or strongly restrict) the vague "may be either a method or a simple function" mode that's the current default. I'm handling the iterator checkers in this separate commit because they're infamously complex; but I don't expect any trouble because this transition doesn't interact with the "central" logic of iterator handling.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1 Author: None (NagyDonat) ChangesThis commit explicitly specifies the matching mode (C library function, any non-method function, or C++ method) for the This change won't cause major functional changes, but isn't NFC because it ensures that e.g. call descriptions for a non-method function won't accidentally match a method that has the same name. Separate commits will perform (or have already performed) this change in other checkers. My goal is to ensure that the call description mode is always explicitly specified and eliminate (or strongly restrict) the vague "may be either a method or a simple function" mode that's the current default. I'm handling the iterator checkers in this separate commit because they're infamously complex; but I don't expect any trouble because this transition doesn't interact with the "central" logic of iterator handling. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88913.diff 6 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ContainerModeling.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ContainerModeling.cpp
index 009c0d3fb93686..55ed809bfed6ce 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ContainerModeling.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ContainerModeling.cpp
@@ -72,26 +72,31 @@ class ContainerModeling
SVal) const;
CallDescriptionMap<NoItParamFn> NoIterParamFunctions = {
- {{{"clear"}, 0}, &ContainerModeling::handleClear},
- {{{"assign"}, 2}, &ContainerModeling::handleAssign},
- {{{"push_back"}, 1}, &ContainerModeling::handlePushBack},
- {{{"emplace_back"}, 1}, &ContainerModeling::handlePushBack},
- {{{"pop_back"}, 0}, &ContainerModeling::handlePopBack},
- {{{"push_front"}, 1}, &ContainerModeling::handlePushFront},
- {{{"emplace_front"}, 1}, &ContainerModeling::handlePushFront},
- {{{"pop_front"}, 0}, &ContainerModeling::handlePopFront},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"clear"}, 0}, &ContainerModeling::handleClear},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"assign"}, 2}, &ContainerModeling::handleAssign},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"push_back"}, 1}, &ContainerModeling::handlePushBack},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"emplace_back"}, 1},
+ &ContainerModeling::handlePushBack},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"pop_back"}, 0}, &ContainerModeling::handlePopBack},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"push_front"}, 1},
+ &ContainerModeling::handlePushFront},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"emplace_front"}, 1},
+ &ContainerModeling::handlePushFront},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"pop_front"}, 0}, &ContainerModeling::handlePopFront},
};
CallDescriptionMap<OneItParamFn> OneIterParamFunctions = {
- {{{"insert"}, 2}, &ContainerModeling::handleInsert},
- {{{"emplace"}, 2}, &ContainerModeling::handleInsert},
- {{{"erase"}, 1}, &ContainerModeling::handleErase},
- {{{"erase_after"}, 1}, &ContainerModeling::handleEraseAfter},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"insert"}, 2}, &ContainerModeling::handleInsert},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"emplace"}, 2}, &ContainerModeling::handleInsert},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"erase"}, 1}, &ContainerModeling::handleErase},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"erase_after"}, 1},
+ &ContainerModeling::handleEraseAfter},
};
CallDescriptionMap<TwoItParamFn> TwoIterParamFunctions = {
- {{{"erase"}, 2}, &ContainerModeling::handleErase},
- {{{"erase_after"}, 2}, &ContainerModeling::handleEraseAfter},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"erase"}, 2}, &ContainerModeling::handleErase},
+ {{CDM::CXXMethod, {"erase_after"}, 2},
+ &ContainerModeling::handleEraseAfter},
};
};
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/DebugContainerModeling.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/DebugContainerModeling.cpp
index 72186a99d94358..d3830a01dd0cbd 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/DebugContainerModeling.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/DebugContainerModeling.cpp
@@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ class DebugContainerModeling
CheckerContext &) const;
CallDescriptionMap<FnCheck> Callbacks = {
- {{{"clang_analyzer_container_begin"}, 1},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"clang_analyzer_container_begin"}, 1},
&DebugContainerModeling::analyzerContainerBegin},
- {{{"clang_analyzer_container_end"}, 1},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"clang_analyzer_container_end"}, 1},
&DebugContainerModeling::analyzerContainerEnd},
};
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/DebugIteratorModeling.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/DebugIteratorModeling.cpp
index 79ab71d7829db7..203743dacda636 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/DebugIteratorModeling.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/DebugIteratorModeling.cpp
@@ -43,11 +43,11 @@ class DebugIteratorModeling
CheckerContext &) const;
CallDescriptionMap<FnCheck> Callbacks = {
- {{{"clang_analyzer_iterator_position"}, 1},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"clang_analyzer_iterator_position"}, 1},
&DebugIteratorModeling::analyzerIteratorPosition},
- {{{"clang_analyzer_iterator_container"}, 1},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"clang_analyzer_iterator_container"}, 1},
&DebugIteratorModeling::analyzerIteratorContainer},
- {{{"clang_analyzer_iterator_validity"}, 1},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"clang_analyzer_iterator_validity"}, 1},
&DebugIteratorModeling::analyzerIteratorValidity},
};
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IteratorModeling.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IteratorModeling.cpp
index a95e811c2a4181..5649454b4cd47e 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IteratorModeling.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IteratorModeling.cpp
@@ -129,19 +129,20 @@ class IteratorModeling
CallDescriptionMap<AdvanceFn> AdvanceLikeFunctions = {
// template<class InputIt, class Distance>
// void advance(InputIt& it, Distance n);
- {{{"std", "advance"}, 2}, &IteratorModeling::handleAdvance},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "advance"}, 2},
+ &IteratorModeling::handleAdvance},
// template<class BidirIt>
// BidirIt prev(
// BidirIt it,
// typename std::iterator_traits<BidirIt>::difference_type n = 1);
- {{{"std", "prev"}, 2}, &IteratorModeling::handlePrev},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "prev"}, 2}, &IteratorModeling::handlePrev},
// template<class ForwardIt>
// ForwardIt next(
// ForwardIt it,
// typename std::iterator_traits<ForwardIt>::difference_type n = 1);
- {{{"std", "next"}, 2}, &IteratorModeling::handleNext},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "next"}, 2}, &IteratorModeling::handleNext},
};
public:
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IteratorRangeChecker.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IteratorRangeChecker.cpp
index d2b61fb92483c3..4dd2f700a2a0eb 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IteratorRangeChecker.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IteratorRangeChecker.cpp
@@ -56,10 +56,15 @@ class IteratorRangeChecker
using AdvanceFn = void (IteratorRangeChecker::*)(CheckerContext &, SVal,
SVal) const;
+ // FIXME: these three functions are also listed in IteratorModeling.cpp,
+ // perhaps unify their handling?
CallDescriptionMap<AdvanceFn> AdvanceFunctions = {
- {{{"std", "advance"}, 2}, &IteratorRangeChecker::verifyAdvance},
- {{{"std", "prev"}, 2}, &IteratorRangeChecker::verifyPrev},
- {{{"std", "next"}, 2}, &IteratorRangeChecker::verifyNext},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "advance"}, 2},
+ &IteratorRangeChecker::verifyAdvance},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "prev"}, 2},
+ &IteratorRangeChecker::verifyPrev},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "next"}, 2},
+ &IteratorRangeChecker::verifyNext},
};
};
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/STLAlgorithmModeling.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/STLAlgorithmModeling.cpp
index a5173a05636a09..e037719b902986 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/STLAlgorithmModeling.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/STLAlgorithmModeling.cpp
@@ -33,29 +33,50 @@ class STLAlgorithmModeling : public Checker<eval::Call> {
const CallExpr *) const;
const CallDescriptionMap<FnCheck> Callbacks = {
- {{{"std", "find"}, 3}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "find"}, 4}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "find_if"}, 3}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "find_if"}, 4}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "find_if_not"}, 3}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "find_if_not"}, 4}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "find_first_of"}, 4}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "find_first_of"}, 5}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "find_first_of"}, 6}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "find_end"}, 4}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "find_end"}, 5}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "find_end"}, 6}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "lower_bound"}, 3}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "lower_bound"}, 4}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "upper_bound"}, 3}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "upper_bound"}, 4}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "search"}, 3}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "search"}, 4}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "search"}, 5}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "search"}, 6}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "search_n"}, 4}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "search_n"}, 5}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
- {{{"std", "search_n"}, 6}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "find"}, 3}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "find"}, 4}, &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "find_if"}, 3},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "find_if"}, 4},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "find_if_not"}, 3},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "find_if_not"}, 4},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "find_first_of"}, 4},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "find_first_of"}, 5},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "find_first_of"}, 6},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "find_end"}, 4},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "find_end"}, 5},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "find_end"}, 6},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "lower_bound"}, 3},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "lower_bound"}, 4},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "upper_bound"}, 3},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "upper_bound"}, 4},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "search"}, 3},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "search"}, 4},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "search"}, 5},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "search"}, 6},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "search_n"}, 4},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "search_n"}, 5},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
+ {{CDM::SimpleFunc, {"std", "search_n"}, 6},
+ &STLAlgorithmModeling::evalFind},
};
public:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be all good.
FYI std lib funcs are not always functions. They could be also niebloids, which we cant actually hook. This shouldnt affect these apis though. I left it here as food for thought.
Uh oh, those niebloids are really deep black magic ☠️ I didn't know about them previously, so thanks for mentioning them. |
This commit explicitly specifies the matching mode (C library function, any non-method function, or C++ method) for the
CallDescription
s constructed in the iterator/container checkers.This change won't cause major functional changes, but isn't NFC because it ensures that e.g. call descriptions for a non-method function won't accidentally match a method that has the same name.
Separate commits will perform (or have already performed) this change in other checkers. My goal is to ensure that the call description mode is always explicitly specified and eliminate (or strongly restrict) the vague "may be either a method or a simple function" mode that's the current default.
I'm handling the iterator checkers in this separate commit because they're infamously complex; but I don't expect any trouble because this transition doesn't interact with the "central" logic of iterator handling.