Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[InstCombine] Add multi-use tests for shift-of-shift transform (NFC) #95497

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

frobtech
Copy link
Contributor

Also drop irrelevant function attributes from tests.

This aligns Fuchsia targets with other similar OS targets such as
Linux.  Fuchsia's libc already uses unsigned rather than the
compiler-provided __WINT_TYPE__ macro for its wint_t typedef, so
this just makes the compiler consistent with the OS's actual ABI.
The only known manifestation of the mismatch is -Wformat warnings
for %lc no matching wint_t arguments.

The closest thing I could see to existing tests for each target's
wint_t type setting was the predefine tests that check various
macros including __WINT_TYPE__ on a per-machine and/or per-OS
basis.  While the setting is done per-OS in most of the target
implementations rather than actually varying by machine, the only
existing tests for __WINT_TYPE__ are in per-machine checks that
are also wholly or partly tagged as per-OS.  x86_64 and riscv64
tests for respective *-linux-gnu targets now check for the same
definitions in the respective *-fuchsia targets.  __WINT_TYPE__
is not among the type checked in the aarch64 tests and those lack
a section that's specifically tested for aarch64-linux-gnu; if
such is added then it can similarly be made to check for most or
all of the same value on aarch64-fuchsia as aarch64-linux-gnu.
But since the actual implementation of choosing the type is done
per-OS and not per-machine for the three machines with Fuchsia
target support, the x86 and riscv64 tests are already redundantly
testing that same code and seem sufficient.
@frobtech frobtech closed this Jun 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant