Skip to content
Switch branches/tags
This branch is up to date with master.

Latest commit


Git stats


Failed to load latest commit information.
Latest commit message
Commit time

The repo contains source code of the paper Robustra.

Built based on Wong and Zico's dual LP training framework, we do several major extensions:

  • Transferability-based dual training (see convex_adversarial/, examples/

  • Adaptor for model weight transformation for verification on MILP solver proposed by Tjeng et al (arXiv: 1711.07356, ICLR 2019)

  • Our trained model weights in final_models/ (the naming corresponds to estimated LP bound, and the exact number for each model will be given later)

Code cleaning and detail documentation is in progress.

Below is original from Wong and Zico.

Provably robust neural networks

A repository for training provably robust neural networks by optimizing convex outer bounds on the adversarial polytope. Created by Eric Wong and Zico Kolter. Link to the original arXiv paper. The method has been further extended to be fully modular, scalable, and use cascades to improve robust error. Check out our new paper on arXiv: Scaling provable adversarial defenses.


  • 10/30/2018 - Version 0.4 released to reflect the NIPS final copy. Added model weights for all models described in the paper.
  • 7/26/2018 - Version 0.3.3 code refactor
  • 6/2/2018 - Version 0.3.1 released to reflect the new paper.
  • 5/31/2018 - New paper on a scalable version for models with skip connections and a fully modular implementation for simple extension. Code base with these improvements with a port to PyTorch 0.4 will be released shortly.
  • 4/26/2018 - Added robust models from the paper to the models/ folder in the repository.
  • 3/4/2018 - Updated paper with more experiments. Code migrated to work with PyTorch 0.3.0+. Real mini-batching implemented, with a 5x speedup over the old codebase, and several NaN bugfixes.
  • 12/8/2017 - Best defense paper at the NIPS 2017 ML & Security Workshop
  • 11/2/2017 - Initial preprint and release of codebase.

Installation & Usage

You can install this repository with pip install convex_adversarial

If you wish to have the version of code that reflects the first paper, use pip install convex_adversal=0.2, or clone the 0.2 release on Github.

The package contains the following functions:

  • robust_loss(net, epsilon, X, y, l1_proj=None, ​ l1_type='exact', bounded_input=False, size_average=True)

    computes a robust loss function for a given ReLU network net and l1 radius epsilon for examples X and their labels y. You can use this as a drop in replacement for, say, nn.CrossEntropyLoss(), and is equivalent to the objective of Equation 14 in the original paper. To use the scalable version, specify a projection dimension with l1_proj and set l1_type to median.

  • robust_loss_parallel computes the same objective as robust_loss, but only for a single example and using
    data parallelism. This is useful for exact evaluation if a single example doesn't fit in memory.

  • dual_net = DualNetwork(net, X, epsilon, l1_proj=None, l1_type='exact', bounded_input=False) is a PyTorch module that computes the layer-wise upper and lower bounds for all activations in the network. This is useful if you are only interested in the bounds and not the robust loss, and corresponds to Algorithm 1 in the paper.

  • dual_net(c) is the module's forward pass which computes the lower bound on the primal problem described in the paper for a given objective vector c. This corresponds to computing objective of Theorem 1 in the paper (Equation 5).

Why do we need robust networks?

While networks are capable of representing highly complex functions. For example, with today's networks it is an easy task to achieve 99% accuracy on the MNIST digit recognition dataset, and we can quickly train a small network that can accurately predict that the following image is a 7.

However, the versatility of neural networks comes at a cost: these networks are highly susceptible to small perturbations, or adversarial attacks (e.g. the fast gradient sign method and projected gradient descent)! While most of us can recognize that the following image is still a 7, the same network that could correctly classify the above image instead classifies the following image as a 3.

While this is a relatively harmless example, one can easily think of situations where such adversarial perturbations can be dangerous and costly (e.g. autonomous driving).

What are robust networks?

Robust networks are networks that are trained to protect against any sort of adversarial perturbation. Specifically, for any seen training example, the network is robust if it is impossible to cause the network to incorrectly classify the example by adding a small perturbation.

How do we do this?

The short version: we use the dual of a convex relaxation of the network over the adversarial polytope to lower bound the output. This lower bound can be expressed as another deep network with the same model parameters, and optimizing this lower bound allows us to guarantee robustness of the network.

The long version: see our original paper, Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytope.

For our updated version which is scalable, modular, and achieves even better robust performance, see our new paper, Scaling provable adversarial defenses.

What difference does this make?

We illustrate the power of training robust networks in the following two scenarios: 2D toy case for a visualization, and on the MNIST dataset. More experiments are in the paper.

2D toy example

To illustrate the difference, consider a binary classification task on 2D space, separating red dots from blue dots. Optimizing a neural network in the usual fashion gives us the following classifier on the left, and our robust method gives the classifier on the right. The squares around each example represent the adversarial region of perturbations.

For the standard classifier, a number of the examples have perturbation regions that contain both red and blue. These examples are susceptible to adversarial attacks that will flip the output of the neural network. On the other hand, the robust network has all perturbation regions fully contained in the either red or blue, and so this network is robust: we are guaranteed that there is no possible adversarial perturbation to flip the label of any example.

Robustness to adversarial attacks: MNIST classification

As mentioned before, it is easy to fool networks trained on the MNIST dataset when using attacks such as the fast gradient sign method (FGS) and projected gradient descent (PGD). We observe that PGD can almost always fool the MNIST trained network.

Base error FGS error PGD Error Robust Error
Original 1.1% 50.0% 81.7% 100%
Robust 1.8% 3.9% 4.1% 5.8%

On the other hand, the robust network is significantly less affected by these attacks. In fact, when optimizing the robust loss, we can additionally calculate a robust error which gives an provable upper bound on the error caused by any adversarial perturbation. In this case, the robust network has a robust error of 5.8%, and so we are guaranteed that no adversarial attack can ever get an error rate of larger than 5.8%. In comparison, the robust error of the standard network is 100%. More results on HAR, Fashion-MNIST, and SVHN can be found in the paper. Results for the scalable version with random projections on residual networks and on the CIFAR10 dataset can be found in our second paper.


Dual operations

The package currently has dual operators for the following constrained input spaces and layers. These are defined in and

Dual input spaces

  • InfBall : L-infinity ball constraint on the input
  • InfBallBounded : L-infinity ball constraint on the input, with additional bounding box constraints (works for [0,1] box constraints).
  • InfBallProj : L-infinity ball constraint using Cauchy random projections
  • InfBallProjBounded : L-infinity ball constraint using Cauchy random projections, with additional bounding box constraints (works for [0,1] box constraints)
  • L2Ball : L-2 ball constraint on the input
  • L2BallProj : L-2 ball constraint using Normal random projections

Dual layers

  • DualLinear : linear, fully connected layers
  • DualConv2d : 2d convolutional layers
  • DualReshape : reshaping layers, e.g. flattening dimensions
  • DualReLU : ReLU activations
  • DualReLUProj : ReLU activations using Cauchy random projections
  • DualDense : Dense layers, for skip connections
  • DualBatchNorm2d : 2d batch-norm layers, assuming a fixed mean and variance
  • Identity : Identity operator, e.g. for some ResNet skip connections

Due to the modularity of the implementation, it is easy to extend the methodology to additional dual layers. A dual input or dual layer can be implemented by filling in the following signature:

class DualObject(nn.Module, metaclass=ABCMeta): 
    def __init__(self): 
        """ Initialize a dual layer by initializing the variables needed to
        compute this layer's contribution to the upper and lower bounds. 

        In the paper, if this object is at layer i, this is initializing `h'
        with the required cached values when nu[i]=I and nu[i]=-I. 

    def apply(self, dual_layer):
        """ Advance cached variables initialized in this class by the given
        dual layer.  """
        raise NotImplementedError

    def bounds(self): 
        """ Return this layers contribution to the upper and lower bounds. In
        the paper, this is the `h' upper bound where nu is implicitly given by
        c=I and c=-I. """
        raise NotImplementedError

    def objective(self, *nus): 
        """ Return this layers contribution to the objective, given some
        backwards pass. In the paper, this is the `h' upper bound evaluated on a
        the given nu variables. 

        If this is layer i, then we get as input nu[k] through nu[i]. 
        So non-residual layers will only need nu[-1] and nu[-2]. """
        raise NotImplementedError

class DualLayer(DualObject): 
    def forward(self, *xs): 
        """ Given previous inputs, apply the affine layer (forward pass) """ 
        raise NotImplementedError

    def T(self, *xs): 
        """ Given previous inputs, apply the transposed affine layer 
        (backward pass) """
        raise NotImplementedError

Residual networks / skip connections

To create sequential PyTorch modules with skip connections, we provide a generalization of the PyTorch module nn.Sequential. Specifically, we have a DenseSequential module that is identical to nn.Sequential but also takes in Dense' modules. The Dense' modules consist of m layers, and applies these m layers to the last m outputs of the network.

As an example, the following is a simple two layer network with a single skip connection. The first layer is identical to a normal nn.Conv2d layer. The second layer has a skip connection from the layer with 16 filters and also a normal convolutional layer from the previous layer with 32 filters.

residual_block = DenseSequential([
    Dense(nn.Conv2d(16,32,...), None, nn.Conv2d(32,32,...))

What is in this repository?

  • The code implementing the robust loss function that measures the convex outer bounds on the adversarial polytope as described in the paper.
  • The implemented dual layers are linear layers, convolutional layers, ReLU layers, ReLU layers with random projections, all of which can be used with skip connections.
  • The implemented dual input constraints are l1 bounded perturbations, its projection variant, and l1 bounded perturbation with an additional [0,1] rectangle box constraint.
  • Examples, containing the following:
    • Code to train a robust classifier for the MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, HAR, and SVHN datasets.
    • Code to generate and plot the 2D toy example.
    • Code to find minimum distances to the decision boundary of the neural network
    • Code to attack models using FGS and PGD
    • Code to solve the primal problem exactly using CVXPY
    • Code to train large MNIST and CIFAR10 models using random projections and residual networks


A method for training neural networks that are provably robust to adversarial attacks.







No packages published