Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Misleading y label in the qqmath function #394
Comments
|
What version is your |
ylazar
commented
Aug 29, 2016
|
I meant the corresponding vignette, available at CRAN. You can find it at the top of page 33. |
|
I think this is a confusion (on whose part I won't say) between the different possible ways of scaling residuals. What we meant in the vignette was that the residuals are not adjusted to account for difference in influence. For a hint of the confusion surrounding this issue see here ... Any suggestions for clarifying this without further muddying the waters would be appreciated ...
From
From
|
ylazar commentedAug 28, 2016
•
edited
The
lme4::lmerdocumentation states thatHowever, when running the Q-Q plot command that this statement refers to (
lattice::qqmath()),the resulting y axis states "standardized residuals":

So at least one of the two - documentation or label - must be incorrect.