fix: evaluate function return awaitable handle with AsyncIO

[PLAYPANDA]

Refactor evaluate function to return an awaitable handle using asyncio. This change addresses the issue where the event loop was already running, preventing proper execution of the evaluation function.
#101

---

Important

Refactor evaluate() in evaluations.py to return an awaitable handle when the event loop is already running, addressing issue #101.

• Behavior:
  • Refactor evaluate() in evaluations.py to return an awaitable handle when the event loop is already running.
  • Addresses issue RuntimeError in Laminar Evaluations with AsyncIO #101 where the event loop was already running, preventing proper execution.
• Misc:
  • No changes to function signatures or parameters.

^{This description was created by for a1d180e. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to a1d180e in 51 seconds

More details

• Looked at 12 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 4 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. src/lmnr/sdk/evaluations.py:484

• Draft comment:
  When the event loop is running, the function now returns an awaitable (evaluation.run()) instead of awaiting it. Ensure that the caller properly awaits this returned coroutine to avoid unexpected behavior.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  The comment is asking the PR author to ensure that the caller properly awaits the returned coroutine. This falls under the category of asking the author to ensure behavior is intended or tested, which violates the rules.

2. src/lmnr/sdk/evaluations.py:483

• Draft comment:
  Returning evaluation.run() directly when the loop is already running is the correct fix for the running event loop. Ensure callers await the returned coroutine.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment looked like it was already resolved.

3. src/lmnr/sdk/evaluations.py:115

• Draft comment:
  Typo: The init docstring says 'Initializes an instance of the Evaluations class.' Consider changing 'Evaluations' to 'Evaluation' to match the class name.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

4. src/lmnr/sdk/evaluations.py:422

• Draft comment:
  Typo/Redundancy: The 'evaluators' parameter in the evaluate() function docstring is documented twice with different type hints. Consider removing or merging the duplicate descriptions for clarity.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_ySCwLGs2KkO29Kve

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[dinmukhamedm]

Thanks for this @PLAYPANDA