Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upHide comments from specific users #197
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jcs
Jul 20, 2015
Contributor
That would break threading, so is it supposed to hide the entire thread under a blocked comment?
|
That would break threading, so is it supposed to hide the entire thread under a blocked comment? |
jcs
added
the
featurereq
label
Jul 20, 2015
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
kyrias
Aug 23, 2015
You could possibly replace the comment with an empty dummy-comment, having the user listed as ignored.
kyrias
commented
Aug 23, 2015
|
You could possibly replace the comment with an empty dummy-comment, having the user listed as ignored. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
bconway
Sep 3, 2015
+1. I've found an increasing number of users that inject their politics into every post they make and find myself avoiding discussions entirely.
bconway
commented
Sep 3, 2015
|
+1. I've found an increasing number of users that inject their politics into every post they make and find myself avoiding discussions entirely. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
wickedchicken
Sep 3, 2015
The UI I was imagining would be as follows (using ⋅⋅⋅ to signify indents, markdown doesn't seem to like spaces):
user1 2 hours ago | link | reply
An insightful comment.
⋅⋅⋅ [hidden] 16 minutes ago | unhide
⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅ user1 4 minutes ago | link | reply
⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅Another insightful comment responding to the hidden one.
wickedchicken
commented
Sep 3, 2015
|
The UI I was imagining would be as follows (using ⋅⋅⋅ to signify indents, markdown doesn't seem to like spaces): user1 2 hours ago | link | reply ⋅⋅⋅ [hidden] 16 minutes ago | unhide ⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅ user1 4 minutes ago | link | reply |
blueyedgeek
referenced this issue
Nov 25, 2016
Closed
Hide comments from specific users [issue #197] #329
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
pushcx
Nov 26, 2016
Member
I wrote a greasemonkey script for myself a while ago:
// ==UserScript==
// @name Mute Lobsters
// @namespace http://lobste.rs/u/pushcx
// @description remove domains and user comments/stories
// @include https://lobste.rs/*
// @version 1
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==
domain = 'example.com';
username = 'example';
// hide site
[].slice.call(document.querySelectorAll('.story a.domain[href="/search?q=domain:' + domain + '&order=newest"]')).forEach(function (el) { el.closest(".story").remove() });
// hide stories
[].slice.call(document.querySelectorAll('.story .byline a[href="/u/' + username + '"')).forEach(function (el) { el.closest(".story").remove() });
// you may want this to be a.user_is_author if you only want to block their text posts
// hide comments
[].slice.call(document.querySelectorAll('.comment a[href="/u/' + username + '"]')).forEach(function (el) { el.closest(".comment").remove() });- Edited 2017-03-23 to hide submitted stories
- Edited 2018-05-22 to document a little better
|
I wrote a greasemonkey script for myself a while ago: // ==UserScript==
// @name Mute Lobsters
// @namespace http://lobste.rs/u/pushcx
// @description remove domains and user comments/stories
// @include https://lobste.rs/*
// @version 1
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==
domain = 'example.com';
username = 'example';
// hide site
[].slice.call(document.querySelectorAll('.story a.domain[href="/search?q=domain:' + domain + '&order=newest"]')).forEach(function (el) { el.closest(".story").remove() });
// hide stories
[].slice.call(document.querySelectorAll('.story .byline a[href="/u/' + username + '"')).forEach(function (el) { el.closest(".story").remove() });
// you may want this to be a.user_is_author if you only want to block their text posts
// hide comments
[].slice.call(document.querySelectorAll('.comment a[href="/u/' + username + '"]')).forEach(function (el) { el.closest(".comment").remove() });
|
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
crertel
Nov 26, 2016
Contributor
@wickedchicken @bconway have you considered just...ignoring...those posts? Also, you might want to link to some examples to show what you mean.
Adding additional echochamber features is probably not a great idea.
|
@wickedchicken @bconway have you considered just...ignoring...those posts? Also, you might want to link to some examples to show what you mean. Adding additional echochamber features is probably not a great idea. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
bconway
Nov 26, 2016
@crertel Thanks for the tip. Since I left the site over a year ago, it's probably safe for me to unsubscribe from this conversation.
bconway
commented
Nov 26, 2016
|
@crertel Thanks for the tip. Since I left the site over a year ago, it's probably safe for me to unsubscribe from this conversation. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
wickedchicken
Nov 26, 2016
@crertel I originally made this request after scrolling through pages of comments made by a person who preferred the "wall of text" approach to discussion. This made it quite difficult to ignore the posts.
I've seen (and written) a few lengthy comments here and there, but I don't think long comments are a general problem in lobsters. I have seen specific users overly rely on long comments, which is why I requested "hide specific users" and not "deal with the long comment problem" (which I imagine would be a much more involved discussion).
wickedchicken
commented
Nov 26, 2016
|
@crertel I originally made this request after scrolling through pages of comments made by a person who preferred the "wall of text" approach to discussion. This made it quite difficult to ignore the posts. I've seen (and written) a few lengthy comments here and there, but I don't think long comments are a general problem in lobsters. I have seen specific users overly rely on long comments, which is why I requested "hide specific users" and not "deal with the long comment problem" (which I imagine would be a much more involved discussion). |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
crertel
Nov 27, 2016
Contributor
@wickedchicken ah, gotcha. @pushcx 's script is probably a good help for the moment then. :)
|
@wickedchicken ah, gotcha. @pushcx 's script is probably a good help for the moment then. :) |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
danielcompton
Mar 23, 2017
I've made a meta post for discussion/feedback on whether this is wanted by the community here: https://lobste.rs/s/debnsq/hiding_comments_by_specific_users.
danielcompton
commented
Mar 23, 2017
•
|
I've made a meta post for discussion/feedback on whether this is wanted by the community here: https://lobste.rs/s/debnsq/hiding_comments_by_specific_users. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jcs
Mar 28, 2017
Contributor
Sorry, but there didn't seem to be a lot of concensus around wanting this.
|
Sorry, but there didn't seem to be a lot of concensus around wanting this. |
wickedchicken commentedMar 30, 2015
Hi,
Much in the same way stories can be hidden, I'd like for comments by certain users to be hidden as well. Ideally this could show up as which could be clicked and expanded if desired.
The reason I am requesting this is that there are certain commenters whom I would like to avoid, but don't think should be outright banned from the site. A private block seems like a happy solution.
Thanks for lobste.rs, it's great!