New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Give more invite info #244

Closed
pushcx opened this Issue Dec 7, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@pushcx
Member

pushcx commented Dec 7, 2015

I'd like to add more explicit information on how to get an invitation to the about and chat pages, as I've met a number of people who've glanced off the site due to not having clear next steps. This is an attempt to make the chat room's general sentiment more explicit, so I'd appreciate if folks would chime in - I'm linking this from the chat room and a meta thread.

(The about and chat pages are gitignored or I'd PR.)

On /about, after "promote exclusivity", I'd add:

The best way to get an account is to talk to someone you recognize from the site, but you can also get one from the chat room.

And on /chat, I'd add two things. To the end of the first paragraph:

The chat room isn't busy enough that there's always someone talking, so don't be surprised if you try to start a conversation and no one responds. Leave it open and you'll see activity, though we're most active in US work hours.

And I'd replace "Asking users in the channel for invitations to Lobsters is not acceptable." with

Interesting people are always welcome on Lobsters, but spamming the chat room for invites is not acceptable. If you are the author or otherwise involved with a story on the site, ask and someone will invite you. Alternately, offer some good links or thoughts on a story and someone will likely invite you so can post them.

@NattyNarwhal

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@NattyNarwhal

NattyNarwhal Dec 7, 2015

"Interesting people" to me implies really special people, which people might not perceive themselves as. I think something else might fit better; people interested in contributing, maybe?

NattyNarwhal commented Dec 7, 2015

"Interesting people" to me implies really special people, which people might not perceive themselves as. I think something else might fit better; people interested in contributing, maybe?

@pushcx

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pushcx

pushcx Dec 7, 2015

Member

I think that is an excellent criticism. Maybe just "New contributors are..."

Member

pushcx commented Dec 7, 2015

I think that is an excellent criticism. Maybe just "New contributors are..."

jcs added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2015

@jcs

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jcs

jcs Dec 7, 2015

Contributor

Ok I added text in various places.

Contributor

jcs commented Dec 7, 2015

Ok I added text in various places.

@jcs jcs closed this Dec 7, 2015

SiDevesh pushed a commit to RedCarpetUp/lobsters that referenced this issue Jul 11, 2016

SiDevesh pushed a commit to RedCarpetUp/lobsters that referenced this issue Aug 1, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment