Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

two common bugfix #173

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 23, 2019
Merged

two common bugfix #173

merged 1 commit into from Apr 23, 2019

Conversation

abc3660170
Copy link
Contributor

  1. fixbug: escape packages's name have '/'
  2. fixbug: early version of Object.keys not support characters

Description

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

2. fixbug: early version of Object.keys not support characters
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
"devDependencies": {
"babel-core": "^6.26.0",
"babel-loader": "^7.1.2",
"babel-polyfill": "^6.26.0",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is the babel polyfill needed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't remember very clear, it seems like Object.keys in early Chrome not support traversing characters

@gabrielcsapo gabrielcsapo merged commit d55244d into local-npm:master Apr 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants