splits style.advanced into raster and feature bundle #270
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@moovida Are you kind enought to review and comment changes I made? Especially all changes regarding ColorEditors ;) |
|
Relates to #269 |
* cleans codebase regading ColorEditors, removes StolenColorEditor * moves common usable classes to public packages * moves common functionality to style.advanced.core module * renames style.advanced to style.advanced.feature Signed-off-by: Frank Gasdorf <fgdrf@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Frank Gasdorf <fgdrf@users.sourceforge.net>
fgdrf
force-pushed
the
F_split_up_advanced_style
branch
from
c302f95
to
94e2b8a
Compare
|
@egouge Again, thank your for testing! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Main idea is to create seperate bundles for advanced styling to use these side by side and standalone from each other. Asume you have a product that has only support for featuretypes, the customer should not get Raster-Styling pages displayed (the product then would not include style.advanced.raster whereas style.advanced.feature is included (was style.advanced)
Signed-off-by: Frank Gasdorf fgdrf@users.sourceforge.net