Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some fixes from my review on RFC-201 #4

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 10, 2017
Merged

Some fixes from my review on RFC-201 #4

merged 3 commits into from Feb 10, 2017

Conversation

timj
Copy link
Member

@timj timj commented Feb 9, 2017

Includes:

  • Citations and clickable links.
  • Mention of DMTN-020
  • Typos

Does not include:

  • DMBP JIRA vs DLP JIRA
  • The note saying that this is going to be implemented by Dec 2016.

Copy link
Contributor

@ktlim ktlim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minimal, unobjectionable fixes.

index.rst Outdated
@@ -44,7 +44,12 @@ the team's efficiency.

The project planning processes described in this documents have been structured to
address all of the above (often not fully aligned!) needs. It is a fusion of
the Earned Value Management System, and the Project Planning with Agile Process.
the Earned Value Management System, and the Project Planning with Agile Process and builds
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comma is inappropriate.

@timj timj merged commit 29ae10f into integration Feb 10, 2017
@ktlim ktlim deleted the u/timj/RFC-201 branch August 25, 2018 01:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants